Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36202407›Full record

ArticleBMJ open respiratory research2022

Small airway function measured using forced expiratory flow between 25% and 75% of vital capacity and its relationship to airflow limitation in symptomatic ever-smokers: a cross-sectional study.

Nowaf Y Alobaidi, Mohammed Almeshari, James Stockley, Robert Andrew Stockley, Elizabeth Sapey

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open respiratory research, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Impact of AerobikaFrontiers in medicine · 2023
    Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Nowaf Y AlobaidiBirmingham Acute Care Research Group, Institute of Inflammation and Ageing, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-0609-5771
Mohammed AlmeshariBirmingham Acute Care Research Group, Institute of Inflammation and Ageing, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-8449-9491
James StockleyLung Function & Sleep Department, Respiratory Medicine, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK.
Robert Andrew StockleyLung Function & Sleep Department, Respiratory Medicine, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK.
Elizabeth SapeyBirmingham Acute Care Research Group, Institute of Inflammation and Ageing, University of Birmingham College of Medical and Dental Sciences, Birmingham, UK e.sapey@bham.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0003-3454-5482
University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust · GBKing Saud bin Abdulaziz University for Health Sciences · SAKing Saud University · SA

Funding

Medical Research Council MC_PC_21015
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundChronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is diagnosed and its severity graded by traditional spirometric parameters (forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV

methodA retrospective analysis of lung function data of 1458 ever-smokers suspected clinically of having COPD. Low FEF

resultsLow FEF

conclusionsLow FEF

Indexed as

Pulmonary Disease, Chronic ObstructiveSmokersCross-Sectional StudiesHumansLungRetrospective StudiesVital CapacityCOPD epidemiologyLung PhysiologyRespiratory Measurement

Identifiers

PMID36202407
PMCPMC9540854
OpenAlexW4303192442

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.