Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36202356›Full record

ArticleThe Science of the total environment2023

Suitability of aircraft wastewater for pathogen detection and public health surveillance.

Davey L Jones, Jennifer M Rhymes, Matthew J Wade, Jessica L Kevill, Shelagh K Malham, Jasmine M S Grimsley, Charlotte Rimmer, Andrew J Weightman, Kata Farkas

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Science of the total environment, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Reconstructing the early spatial spread of pandemic respiratory viruses in the United States.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Davey L JonesCentre for Environmental Biotechnology, Bangor University, Bangor, Gwynedd LL57 2UW, UK; Food Futures Institute, Murdoch University, Murdoch, WA 6105, Australia. Electronic address: d.jones@bangor.ac.uk.
Jennifer M RhymesCentre for Environmental Biotechnology, Bangor University, Bangor, Gwynedd LL57 2UW, UK; UK Centre for Ecology and Hydrology, Bangor, Gwynedd LL57 2UW, UK.
Matthew J WadeNewcastle University, School of Engineering, Cassie Building, Newcastle-upon-Tyne NE1 7RU, UK; UK Health Security Agency, Environmental Monitoring for Health Protection, Windsor House, London SW1H 0TL, UK.
Jessica L KevillCentre for Environmental Biotechnology, Bangor University, Bangor, Gwynedd LL57 2UW, UK.
Shelagh K MalhamSchool of Ocean Sciences, Bangor University, Menai Bridge, Anglesey LL59 5AB, UK.
Jasmine M S GrimsleyUK Health Security Agency, Environmental Monitoring for Health Protection, Windsor House, London SW1H 0TL, UK; The London Data Company, London EC2N 2AT, UK.
Charlotte RimmerCentre for Environmental Biotechnology, Bangor University, Bangor, Gwynedd LL57 2UW, UK.
Andrew J WeightmanMicrobiomes, Microbes and Informatics Group, School of Biosciences, Cardiff University, Cardiff CF10 3AX, UK.
Kata FarkasCentre for Environmental Biotechnology, Bangor University, Bangor, Gwynedd LL57 2UW, UK; The London Data Company, London EC2N 2AT, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

International air travel is now widely recognised as one of the primary mechanisms responsible for the transnational movement and global spread of SARS-CoV-2. Monitoring the viral load and novel lineages within human-derived wastewater collected from aircraft and at air transport hubs has been proposed as an effective way to monitor the importation frequency of viral pathogens. The success of this approach, however, is highly dependent on the bathroom and defecation habits of air passengers during their journey. In this study of UK adults (n = 2103), we quantified the likelihood of defecation prior to departure, on the aircraft and upon arrival on both short- and long-haul flights. The results were then used to assess the likelihood of capturing the signal from infected individuals at UK travel hubs. To obtain a representative cross-section of the population, the survey was stratified by geographical region, gender, age, parenting status, and social class. We found that an individual's likelihood to defecate on short-haul flights (< 6 h in duration) was low (< 13 % of the total), but was higher on long-haul flights (< 36 %; > 6 h in duration). This behaviour pattern was higher among males and younger age groups. The maximum likelihood of defecation was prior to departure (< 39 %). Based on known SARS-CoV-2 faecal shedding rates (30-60 %) and an equal probability of infected individuals being on short- (71 % of inbound flights) and long-haul flights (29 %), we estimate that aircraft wastewater is likely to capture ca. 8-14 % of SARS-CoV-2 cases entering the UK. Monte Carlo simulations predicted that SARS-CoV-2 would be present in wastewater on 14 % of short-haul flights and 62 % of long-haul flights under current pandemic conditions. We conclude that aircraft wastewater alone is insufficient to effectively monitor all the transboundary entries of faecal-borne pathogens but can form part of a wider strategy for public heath surveillance at national borders.

Indexed as

COVID-19WastewaterAdultAircraftHumansMalePublic Health SurveillanceSARS-CoV-2WastewaterInternational air travelPublic health surveillanceSARS-CoV-2Wastewater-based epidemiology

Identifiers

PMID36202356
PMCPMC9528016

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.