Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36202236›Full record

Trial reportThe Journal of pediatrics2023

Effect of Outreach Messages on Adolescent Well-Child Visits and Coronavirus Disease 2019 Vaccine Rates: A Randomized, Controlled Trial.

Mary Carol Burkhardt, Anne E Berset, Yingying Xu, Anne Mescher, William B Brinkman

Registry-linked trialOpen access · greenAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in The Journal of pediatrics, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04904744 (Effect of Varied Outreach Methods on Appointment Scheduling, Appointment Completion, and Receipt of COVID-19 Vaccination), which is not on this map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 31% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04904744 nacompletednot on this map

Effect of Varied Outreach Methods on Appointment Scheduling, Appointment Completion, and Receipt of COVID-19 Vaccination

TypeinterventionalSponsorChildren's Hospital Medical Center, CincinnatiRan2021 to 2021Enrolled1,235ConditionsHealth Care Utilization, Vaccine Preventable DiseaseArmsLow tailored message, No message, Low tailored message plus COVID-19 vaccine message
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Mary Carol BurkhardtDepartment of Pediatrics, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, OH; Division of General & Community Pediatrics, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, OH. Electronic address: mary.burkhardt@cchmc.org.
Anne E BersetDivision of General & Community Pediatrics, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, OH.
Yingying XuDivision of General & Community Pediatrics, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, OH.
Anne MescherDivision of General & Community Pediatrics, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, OH.
William B BrinkmanDepartment of Pediatrics, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, OH; Division of General & Community Pediatrics, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, OH.
Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center · USUniversity of Cincinnati Medical Center · US

Funding

LCenter for Clinical and Translational Science and TrainingUL1TR001425 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF CINCINNATI · PI MEINZEN-DERR, JAREEN, STRAWN, JEFFREY ROBERT · 2015 to 2024
$37.5M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR001425
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo determine effectiveness of text/telephone outreach messages, with and without coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) vaccine information. STUDY

designWe conducted an intent-to-treat, multiarm, randomized clinical trial with adolescents aged 12-17 years. Eligible patients did not have an adolescent well-care visit in the past year or scheduled in the next 45 days or an active electronic health record portal account. We randomized participants to the standard message, COVID-19 vaccine message, or no message (control) group and delivered 2 text messages or telephone calls (per family preference) to the message groups. The primary outcome was adolescent well-care visit completion within 8 weeks, and secondary outcomes were adolescent well-care visit scheduled within 2 weeks and receiving COVID-19 vaccine within 8 weeks.

resultsWe randomized 1235 adolescents (mean age, 14 ± 1.5 years; 51.6% male; 76.7% Black; 4.1% Hispanic/Latinx; 88.3% publicly insured). The standard message group had higher odds of scheduling an adolescent well-care visit compared with the control group (OR, 2.07; 95% CI, 1.21-3.52) and COVID-19 vaccine message group (OR, 1.66; 95% CI, 1.00-2.74). The odds of completing an adolescent well-care visit did not differ significantly (standard message group vs control group; OR, 1.35; 95% CI, 0.88-2.06; COVID-19 vaccine message group vs control group, OR, 1.33; 95% CI, 0.87-2.03). In per-protocol analyses, adolescents in the standard message group were twice as likely as the control group to receive the COVID-19 vaccine (OR, 2.48; 95% CI, 1.05-5.86).

conclusionsOutreach messages were minimally effective. Efforts are needed to address widening disparities. CLINICAL

trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov: NCT04904744.

Indexed as

COVID-19COVID-19 VaccinesText MessagingVaccinationAdolescentChildFemaleHumansMaleTelephoneCOVID-19 Vaccinesdisparitiespediatricspreventative services

Identifiers

PMID36202236
PMCPMC9529346
OpenAlexW4300717336

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.