Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36202133›Full record

ArticleGlobal spine journal2024

Radiological and Clinical Outcomes comparing 2-level MIS Lateral and MIS Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion in Degenerative Lumbar Spinal Stenosis.

Elliot Yeung Chong, Lenice Yue Tong Tan, Christoph Sheng Chong, William Yeo, Don Thong Siang Koh, Lei Jiang, Chang Ming Guo, Reuben C Cheong Soh

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Global spine journal, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Lateral versus posterior approaches to treat degenerative lumbar pathologies-systematic review and meta-analysis of recent literature.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2023
    Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Elliot Yeung ChongYong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore (NUS), Singapore.ORCID 0000-0003-2815-8566
Lenice Yue Tong TanYong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore (NUS), Singapore.
Christoph Sheng ChongLee Kong Chian School of Medicine, National Technological University (NTU), Singapore.
William YeoOrthopaedic Diagnostic Centre, Singapore General Hospital (SGH), Singapore.
Don Thong Siang KohDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Singapore General Hospital (SGH), Singapore.
Lei JiangDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Singapore General Hospital (SGH), Singapore.ORCID 0000-0003-2727-0863
Chang Ming GuoDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Singapore General Hospital (SGH), Singapore.
Reuben C Cheong SohDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Singapore General Hospital (SGH), Singapore.ORCID 0000-0003-2410-5176
Singapore General Hospital · SGNational University of Singapore · SGNanyang Technological University · SG

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

STUDY

designRetrospective Cohort Study.

objectivesTo compare early postoperative radiological and clinical outcomes between 2-level minimally invasive (MIS) trans-psoas lateral lumbar interbody fusion (LLIF) and MIS transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) for degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis.

methodsFifty three consecutive patients undergoing 2-level lumbar interbody fusion from L3-L5 for degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis were enrolled. Twenty four patients underwent LLIF and 29 underwent TLIF.

resultsOperative time and length of stay were similar between LLIF and TLIF (272.8 ± 82.4 vs 256.1 ± 59.4 minutes; 5.5 ± 2.8 vs 4.7 ± 3.3 days,

conclusionThe superior radiological outcomes demonstrated by 2-level trans-psoas LLIF did not translate into difference in clinical outcomes compared to 2-level TLIF at the 2-years follow-up, suggesting both approaches are reasonable for 2-level lumbar interbody fusion in degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis.

Indexed as

2-level, lateralcomparisoncomplicationslateral lumbar interbody fusionminimally invasiveoutcomesradiographtransforaminal lumbar interbody fusion

Identifiers

PMID36202133
PMCPMC11192119
OpenAlexW4302760233

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.