Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36201534›Full record

ArticlePLoS computational biology2022

An ensemble n-sub-epidemic modeling framework for short-term forecasting epidemic trajectories: Application to the COVID-19 pandemic in the USA.

Gerardo Chowell, Sushma Dahal, Amna Tariq, Kimberlyn Roosa, James M Hyman, Ruiyan Luo

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS computational biology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
4.4field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 33 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Comparative evaluation of behavioral epidemic models using COVID-19 data.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. The Future of HIV: Challenges in meeting the 2030medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Dynamic hierarchical state space forecasting.Statistics in medicine · 2024
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Infectious Disease Modelling · 2024
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Missing pieces: People in models.Global epidemiology · 2023
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Gerardo ChowellDepartment of Population Health Sciences, School of Public Health, Georgia State University, Atlanta, Georgia, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0003-2194-2251
Sushma DahalDepartment of Population Health Sciences, School of Public Health, Georgia State University, Atlanta, Georgia, United States of America.
Amna TariqDepartment of Population Health Sciences, School of Public Health, Georgia State University, Atlanta, Georgia, United States of America.
Kimberlyn RoosaNational Institute for Mathematical and Biological Synthesis (NIMBioS), University of Tennessee, Knoxville, Tennessee, United States of America.
James M HymanDepartment of Mathematics, Center for Computational Science, Tulane University, New Orleans, Louisiana, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0001-5247-5794
Ruiyan LuoDepartment of Population Health Sciences, School of Public Health, Georgia State University, Atlanta, Georgia, United States of America.
Georgia State University · USNational Institute for Mathematical and Biological Synthesis · USNational Institutes of Health · USTulane University · US

Funding

Ebola modeling: behavior, asymptomatic infection, and contacts (2019-nCoV Admin Supplement)R01GM130900 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI PORCO, TRAVIS CHRISTIAN · 2019 to 2022
$1.6M
NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM130900
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We analyze an ensemble of n-sub-epidemic modeling for forecasting the trajectory of epidemics and pandemics. These ensemble modeling approaches, and models that integrate sub-epidemics to capture complex temporal dynamics, have demonstrated powerful forecasting capability. This modeling framework can characterize complex epidemic patterns, including plateaus, epidemic resurgences, and epidemic waves characterized by multiple peaks of different sizes. We systematically assess their calibration and short-term forecasting performance in short-term forecasts for the COVID-19 pandemic in the USA from late April 2020 to late February 2022. We compare their performance with two commonly used statistical ARIMA models. The best fit sub-epidemic model and three ensemble models constructed using the top-ranking sub-epidemic models consistently outperformed the ARIMA models in terms of the weighted interval score (WIS) and the coverage of the 95% prediction interval across the 10-, 20-, and 30-day short-term forecasts. In our 30-day forecasts, the average WIS ranged from 377.6 to 421.3 for the sub-epidemic models, whereas it ranged from 439.29 to 767.05 for the ARIMA models. Across 98 short-term forecasts, the ensemble model incorporating the top four ranking sub-epidemic models (Ensemble(4)) outperformed the (log) ARIMA model 66.3% of the time, and the ARIMA model, 69.4% of the time in 30-day ahead forecasts in terms of the WIS. Ensemble(4) consistently yielded the best performance in terms of the metrics that account for the uncertainty of the predictions. This framework can be readily applied to investigate the spread of epidemics and pandemics beyond COVID-19, as well as other dynamic growth processes found in nature and society that would benefit from short-term predictions.

Indexed as

COVID-19ForecastingHumansModels, StatisticalPandemicsTimeUnited States

Identifiers

PMID36201534
PMCPMC9578588
OpenAlexW4302763088

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.