ArticlePloS one2022
Lightweight individual cow identification based on Ghost combined with attention mechanism.
Article in PloS one, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Socializing AI: Integrating Social Network Analysis and Deep Learning for Precision Dairy Cow Monitoring-A Critical Review.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2025Review
- Efficient Convolutional Network Model Incorporating a Multi-Attention Mechanism for Individual Recognition of Holstein Dairy Cows.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2025Article
- A review of on-farm recording tools for smallholder dairy farming in developing countries.Tropical animal health and production · 2024Review
- Open-Set Recognition of Individual Cows Based on Spatial Feature Transformation and Metric Learning.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2024Article
- Lightweight cattle pose estimation with fusion of reparameterization and an attention mechanism.PloS one · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Individual cow identification is a prerequisite for intelligent dairy farming management, and is important for achieving accurate and informative dairy farming. Computer vision-based approaches are widely considered because of their non-contact and practical advantages. In this study, a method based on the combination of Ghost and attention mechanism is proposed to improve ReNet50 to achieve non-contact individual recognition of cows. In the model, coarse-grained features of cows are extracted using a large sensory field of cavity convolution, while reducing the number of model parameters to some extent. ResNet50 consists of two Bottlenecks with different structures, and a plug-and-play Ghost module is inserted between the two Bottlenecks to reduce the number of parameters and computation of the model using common linear operations without reducing the feature map. In addition, the convolutional block attention module (CBAM) is introduced after each stage of the model to help the model to give different weights to each part of the input and extract the more critical and important information. In our experiments, a total of 13 cows' side view images were collected to train the model, and the final recognition accuracy of the model was 98.58%, which was 4.8 percentage points better than the recognition accuracy of the original ResNet50, the number of model parameters was reduced by 24.85 times, and the model size was only 3.61 MB. In addition, to verify the validity of the model, it is compared with other networks and the results show that our model has good robustness. This research overcomes the shortcomings of traditional recognition methods that require human extraction of features, and provides theoretical references for further animal recognition.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.