Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36201486›Full record

ArticlePloS one2022

Lightweight individual cow identification based on Ghost combined with attention mechanism.

Lili Fu, Shijun Li, Shuolin Kong, Ruiwen Ni, Haohong Pang, Yu Sun, Tianli Hu, Ye Mu, Ying Guo, He Gong

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Lili FuCollege of Information Technology, Jilin Agricultural University, Changchun, China.
Shijun LiCollege of Electronic and Information Engineering, Wuzhou University, Wuzhou, China.
Shuolin KongCollege of Information Technology, Jilin Agricultural University, Changchun, China.
Ruiwen NiCollege of Information Technology, Jilin Agricultural University, Changchun, China.
Haohong PangCollege of Information Technology, Jilin Agricultural University, Changchun, China.
Yu SunCollege of Information Technology, Jilin Agricultural University, Changchun, China.
Tianli HuCollege of Information Technology, Jilin Agricultural University, Changchun, China.
Ye MuCollege of Information Technology, Jilin Agricultural University, Changchun, China.
Ying GuoCollege of Information Technology, Jilin Agricultural University, Changchun, China.
He GongCollege of Information Technology, Jilin Agricultural University, Changchun, China.ORCID 0000-0002-9488-7540

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Individual cow identification is a prerequisite for intelligent dairy farming management, and is important for achieving accurate and informative dairy farming. Computer vision-based approaches are widely considered because of their non-contact and practical advantages. In this study, a method based on the combination of Ghost and attention mechanism is proposed to improve ReNet50 to achieve non-contact individual recognition of cows. In the model, coarse-grained features of cows are extracted using a large sensory field of cavity convolution, while reducing the number of model parameters to some extent. ResNet50 consists of two Bottlenecks with different structures, and a plug-and-play Ghost module is inserted between the two Bottlenecks to reduce the number of parameters and computation of the model using common linear operations without reducing the feature map. In addition, the convolutional block attention module (CBAM) is introduced after each stage of the model to help the model to give different weights to each part of the input and extract the more critical and important information. In our experiments, a total of 13 cows' side view images were collected to train the model, and the final recognition accuracy of the model was 98.58%, which was 4.8 percentage points better than the recognition accuracy of the original ResNet50, the number of model parameters was reduced by 24.85 times, and the model size was only 3.61 MB. In addition, to verify the validity of the model, it is compared with other networks and the results show that our model has good robustness. This research overcomes the shortcomings of traditional recognition methods that require human extraction of features, and provides theoretical references for further animal recognition.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceDairyingAnimalsCattleFemaleHumans

Identifiers

PMID36201486
PMCPMC9536640

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.