ArticlePloS one2022
Connecting real-world digital mobility assessment to clinical outcomes for regulatory and clinical endorsement-the Mobilise-D study protocol.
Article in PloS one, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06666816 (Observational Study for the Identification of Fatigue and Gait Biomarkers in Populations With Neuromuscular Pathologies in the Clinical Context and Daily Life), which is not on this map. Cited by 61 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Observational Study for the Identification of Fatigue and Gait Biomarkers in Populations With Neuromuscular Pathologies in the Clinical Context and Daily Life
Who cites it
61 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Real-world gait study of Parkinson's disease using wearable sensors: a systematic review.Journal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation · 2026Pooled it
- Stage-Wise IoT Solutions for Alzheimer's Disease: A Systematic Review of Detection, Monitoring, and Assistive Technologies.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Pooled it
- Sarcopenia screening based on the assessment of gait with inertial measurement units: a systematic review.BMC geriatrics · 2024Pooled it
- E-based physical exercise in patients with multiple sclerosis and comorbidity (COMPACT): feasibility study and protocol for a randomized controlled trial.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Trial
- Impact of Mobility Loss on Independence and Psychosocial Wellbeing in People With Parkinson's Disease and Carers: A Meta-Ethnography.Journal of geriatric psychiatry and neurology · 2026Review
- Investigating mechanisms and monitoring outcomes in functional neurological disorder: the unrealized potential of digital remote monitoring technologies.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2026Review
- Mobgap: A State-of-the-Art Python Framework for Reproducible Estimation and Algorithm Validation of Digital Mobility Outcomes from a Single Wearable Device.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Mobility measures and waking-day movement behaviour composition among older adults: a compositional data analysis of the McMaster Monitoring My Mobility study.The international journal of behavioral nutrition and physical activity · 2026Article
- Walking as a Window to the Brain: Redefining Gait in Neurology.Medical sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Digital patient experience tools in multiple sclerosis: a landscape analysis of the global Patient-Reported Outcomes in Multiple Sclerosis (PROMS) initiative.EClinicalMedicine · 2026Article
- Construct validity of real-world digital mobility outcomes in patients after proximal femoral fracture: a cross-sectional observational study.Scientific reports · 2026Observational
- The construct validity of real-world digital mobility outcomes in people with COPD.ERJ open research · 2026Article
- Digital mobility outcomes to describe real-world walking during recovery from a hip fracture: the Mobilise-D perspective.European geriatric medicine · 2026Article
- The future of clinical trials? Monitoring mobility as an outcome measure in Parkinson's disease: The mobilise-D study.Journal of Parkinson's disease · 2026Article
- Article
- Article
- Real-world walking speed as a digital biomarker and outcome measure for clinical trials-a systematic review, regulatory status and future directions.Frontiers in digital health · 2026Review
- Essential Tremor and Digital Biomarkers: A Scoping Review Using the TRACE Framework to Map Readiness for Clinical Trials and Routine Practice.Tremor and other hyperkinetic movements (New York, N.Y.) · 2026Article
- Digital assessment of real-world walking in people with impaired mobility: How many hours and days are needed?The international journal of behavioral nutrition and physical activity · 2025Article
- Sensors in Multiple Sclerosis.Current neurology and neuroscience reports · 2025Review
1 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
54 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe development of optimal strategies to treat impaired mobility related to ageing and chronic disease requires better ways to detect and measure it. Digital health technology, including body worn sensors, has the potential to directly and accurately capture real-world mobility. Mobilise-D consists of 34 partners from 13 countries who are working together to jointly develop and implement a digital mobility assessment solution to demonstrate that real-world digital mobility outcomes have the potential to provide a better, safer, and quicker way to assess, monitor, and predict the efficacy of new interventions on impaired mobility. The overarching objective of the study is to establish the clinical validity of digital outcomes in patient populations impacted by mobility challenges, and to support engagement with regulatory and health technology agencies towards acceptance of digital mobility assessment in regulatory and health technology assessment decisions. METHODS/
designThe Mobilise-D clinical validation study is a longitudinal observational cohort study that will recruit 2400 participants from four clinical cohorts. The populations of the Innovative Medicine Initiative-Joint Undertaking represent neurodegenerative conditions (Parkinson's Disease), respiratory disease (Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease), neuro-inflammatory disorder (Multiple Sclerosis), fall-related injuries, osteoporosis, sarcopenia, and frailty (Proximal Femoral Fracture). In total, 17 clinical sites in ten countries will recruit participants who will be evaluated every six months over a period of two years. A wide range of core and cohort specific outcome measures will be collected, spanning patient-reported, observer-reported, and clinician-reported outcomes as well as performance-based outcomes (physical measures and cognitive/mental measures). Daily-living mobility and physical capacity will be assessed directly using a wearable device. These four clinical cohorts were chosen to obtain generalizable clinical findings, including diverse clinical, cultural, geographical, and age representation. The disease cohorts include a broad and heterogeneous range of subject characteristics with varying chronic care needs, and represent different trajectories of mobility disability. DISCUSSION: The results of Mobilise-D will provide longitudinal data on the use of digital mobility outcomes to identify, stratify, and monitor disability. This will support the development of widespread, cost-effective access to optimal clinical mobility management through personalised healthcare. Further, Mobilise-D will provide evidence-based, direct measures which can be endorsed by regulatory agencies and health technology assessment bodies to quantify the impact of disease-modifying interventions on mobility.
trial registrationISRCTN12051706.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.