ArticlePloS one2022
Application of the Theoretical Framework of Acceptability to assess a telephone-facilitated health coaching intervention for the prevention and management of type 2 diabetes.
Article in PloS one, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 36 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
36 citing papers in PubMed.
- A qualitative pilot study exploring the acceptability of a peer provider delivered substance use brief intervention from the perspective of youth in Kenya.Substance abuse treatment, prevention, and policy · 2025Trial
- Trial
- The impact of health coaching on the prevention of gestational diabetes in overweight/obese pregnant women: a quasi-experimental study.BMC women's health · 2023Trial
- Process evaluation of a pragmatic implementation trial to support self-management for the prevention and management of type 2 diabetes in Uganda, South Africa and Sweden in the SMART2D project.BMJ open diabetes research & care · 2022Trial
- Acceptability of a Pilot Digital Longitudinal Consultation Clinical Placement for Early-Year Medical Students, Tutors and Patients.The clinical teacher · 2026Article
- Application of the Theoretical Framework of Acceptability in healthcare interventions: a scoping review and proposed reporting checklist.BMC health services research · 2026Article
- Acceptability of ambulatory surgery provided in freestanding ambulatory surgical centers and its associated factors among surgical healthcare providers in Uganda.Surgical endoscopy · 2026Article
- Willingness of adults to accept malaria mass drug administration using the theoretical framework of acceptability: a cross-sectional study in an urban municipality, Ghana.BMC public health · 2026Article
- Evaluating the acceptability of a portable handwashing intervention (the Spatap) in three Fijian communities, a mixed-methods study.BMC public health · 2026Article
- Disentangling Positive Affect Heterogeneity in a Digital Physical Activity Intervention for Young Adult Cancer Survivors: A Group-Based Multi-Trajectory Modeling Approach.Psycho-oncology · 2026Observational
- Adoption of a novel biomarker-guided quality improvement treatment bundle for patients with subclinical acute kidney injury after cardiac surgery: An implementation study.European journal of anaesthesiology · 2026Article
- Psychometric evaluations of the Theoretical Framework of Acceptability (TFA) among adolescent girls and young women in a low-resource setting.Research square · 2026Article
- Development and Preliminary Psychometric Evaluation of the ACRIS-CS: A Theory-Based Measure of Prospective Acceptability of Cognitive Rehabilitation in Cancer Survivors.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- Phage therapy for recurrent urinary tract infections: A qualitative study using the theoretical framework of acceptability.PloS one · 2026Article
- Acceptability of Modified Early Obstetric Warning Systems Among Midwives in Malawi; An Exploratory Qualitative Study.International journal of women's health · 2026Article
- Acceptability of Patient Portals and Phone Consultations in Hybrid Primary Care: A Slovenian Multi-Centre Pilot Study.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Knowledge and acceptability of the Lémann Index as a tool to measure disease progression and bowel damage in Crohn's disease: results from an international survey.Intestinal research · 2025Article
- The Swedish theoretical framework of acceptability questionnaire: translation, cultural adaptation, and descriptive pilot evaluation.BMC health services research · 2025Article
- Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundLifestyle interventions focusing on diet and physical activity for the prevention and management of type 2 diabetes have been found effective. Acceptance of the intervention is crucial. The Theoretical Framework of Acceptability (TFA) developed by Sekhon et al. (2017) describes the multiple facets of acceptance: Affective attitude, burden, perceived effectiveness, ethicality, intervention coherence, opportunity costs and self-efficacy. The aims of this study were to develop and assess the psychometric properties of a measurement scale for acceptance of a telephone-facilitated health coaching intervention, based on the TFA; and to determine the acceptability of the intervention among participants living with diabetes or having a high risk of diabetes in socioeconomically disadvantaged areas in Stockholm.
methodsThis study was nested in the implementation trial SMART2D (Self-management approach and reciprocal learning for type 2 diabetes). The intervention consisted of nine telephone-facilitated health coaching sessions delivered individually over a 6-month period. The acceptability of the intervention was assessed using a questionnaire consisting of 19 Likert scale questions developed using Sekhon's TFA. Exploratory factor analysis (EFA) was performed.
resultsRatings from 49 participants (19 with type 2 diabetes and 30 at high risk of developing diabetes) in ages 38-65 were analyzed. The EFA on the acceptability scale revealed three factors with acceptable reliabilities: affective attitude (alpha 0.90), coherence and understanding (alpha 0.77), perceived burden (alpha 0.85), explaining 82% of the variance. Positive affect and coherence had high median scores and small variance. Median score for perceived burden was low, but with significant variance due to younger individuals and those at high risk reporting higher burden.
conclusionsThe telephone-facilitated health coaching intervention was perceived as acceptable by the study population using a questionnaire based on Sekhon's TFA, with a wider variation in perceived burden seen among high risk and younger participants.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.