Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36201440›Full record

ArticlePloS one2022

Climate change, vaccines, GMO: The N400 effect as a marker of attitudes toward scientific issues.

Łukasz Okruszek, Aleksandra Piejka, Natalia Banasik-Jemielniak, Dariusz Jemielniak

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Łukasz OkruszekSocial Neuroscience Lab, Institute of Psychology, Polish Academy of Sciences, Warsaw, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-7136-2864
Aleksandra PiejkaSocial Neuroscience Lab, Institute of Psychology, Polish Academy of Sciences, Warsaw, Poland.
Natalia Banasik-JemielniakInstitute of Psychology, The Maria Grzegorzewska University, Warsaw, Poland.
Dariusz JemielniakManagement in Networked and Digital Societies (MINDS) Department, Kozminski University, Warsaw, Poland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

While the psychological predictors of antiscience beliefs have been extensively studied, neural underpinnings of the antiscience beliefs have received relatively little interest. The aim of the current study is to investigate whether attitudes towards the scientific issues are reflected in the N400 potential. Thirty-one individuals were asked to judge whether six different issues presented as primes (vaccines, medicines, nuclear energy, solar energy, genetically-modified organisms (GMO), natural farming) are well-described by ten positive and ten negative target words. EEG was recorded during the task. Furthermore, participants were asked to rate their own expertise in each of the six topics. Both positive and negative target words related to GMO elicited larger N400, than targets associated with vaccines and natural farming. The results of the current study show that N400 may be an indicator of the ambiguous attitude toward scientific issues.

Indexed as

Evoked PotentialsVaccinesAttitudeClimate ChangeElectroencephalographyFemaleHumansMalePlants, Genetically ModifiedSemanticsVaccines

Identifiers

PMID36201440
PMCPMC9536546

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.