Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36201429›Full record

ArticlePloS one2022

Maximum acceptable communication delay for the realization of telesurgery.

Akitoshi Nankaku, Masanori Tokunaga, Hiroki Yonezawa, Takahiro Kanno, Kenji Kawashima, Kenichi Hakamada, Satoshi Hirano, Eiji Oki, Masaki Mori, Yusuke Kinugasa

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 37 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
37citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

37 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Guideline
  4. Guideline
  5. Guideline
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Design and Evaluation of a Teleoperated Robotic System for ERCP Cannulation.The international journal of medical robotics + computer assisted surgery : MRCAS · 2026
    Article
  10. Article
  11. System-level evaluation of 5G standalone communication infrastructure for robotic telesurgery.International journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery · 2026
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Surgery for interplanetary space missions.The British journal of surgery · 2026
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Quantifying the effects of delays on telerobotic surgical operability via brain activity measurements.International journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery · 2025
    Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Akitoshi NankakuDepartment of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Tokyo Medical and Dental University, Tokyo, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-9947-9458
Masanori TokunagaDepartment of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Tokyo Medical and Dental University, Tokyo, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-3183-349X
Hiroki YonezawaDepartment of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Tokyo Medical and Dental University, Tokyo, Japan.
Takahiro KannoRiverfield Corporation, Tokyo, Japan.
Kenji KawashimaRiverfield Corporation, Tokyo, Japan.
Kenichi HakamadaDepartment of Gastroenterological Surgery, Hirosaki University, Aomori, Japan.
Satoshi HiranoDepartment of Gastroenterological Surgery II, Hokkaido University Faculty of Medicine, Hokkaido, Japan.
Eiji OkiDepartment of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Kyushu University, Fukuoka, Japan.
Masaki MoriTokai University School of Medicine, Kanagawa, Japan.
Yusuke KinugasaDepartment of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Tokyo Medical and Dental University, Tokyo, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimTo determine acceptable limits of communication delays in telesurgery, we investigated the impact of communication delays under a dynamic environment using a surgical assist robot. Previous studies have evaluated acceptable delays under static environments. Effects of delays may be enhanced in dynamic environments, but studies have not yet focused on this point.

methodsThirty-four subjects with different surgical experience (Group1: no surgical experience; Group2: only laparoscopic surgical experience; Group3: robotic surgery experience) performed 4 tasks under different delays (0, 70, 100, 150, 200, or 300 ms) using a surgical assist robot. Task accomplishment time and total movement distance of forceps were recorded and compared under different communication delays of 0-300 ms. In addition, surgical performance was compared between Group1or Group2 without delay and Group3 with communication delays.

resultsSignificant differences in task accomplishment time were found between delays of 0 and 70 ms, but not between delays of 70 and 100 ms. Thereafter, the greater the communication delay, the longer the task accomplishment time. Similar results were obtained in total movement distance of forceps. Comparisons between Group3 with delay and Group1 or Group2 without delay demonstrated that surgical performance in Group3 with delay was superior or equal to that of Group1 or Group2 without delay as long as the delay was 100 ms or less.

conclusionsCommunication delays in telesurgery may be acceptable if 100 ms or less. Experienced surgeons with more than 100 ms of delay could outperform less-experienced surgeons without delay.

Indexed as

LaparoscopyRobotic Surgical ProceduresTelemedicineHumansTime Factors

Identifiers

PMID36201429
PMCPMC9536636

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.