Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36201394›Full record

ArticleThe American journal of nursing2022

Original Research: COVID-19 Vaccine Hesitancy Among Southern California Nurses.

Lisa R Roberts, Alex Dubov, Brian Distelberg, Bridgette Peteet, Jacinda C Abdul-Mutakabbir, Susanne Montgomery, Pranjal Patel, Ara A Chrissian

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The American journal of nursing, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 35% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Prevalence, nature, and determinants of COVID-19-related conspiracy theories among healthcare workers: a scoping review.European psychiatry : the journal of the Association of European Psychiatrists · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Lisa R RobertsLisa R. Roberts is a professor and director of nursing research in the School of Nursing at Loma Linda University (LLU) in Loma Linda, CA. Alex Dubov is an associate professor, Brian Distelberg and Bridgette Peteet are professors, and Susanne Montgomery is the associate dean of research in the School of Behavioral Health at LLU. Jacinda C. Abdul-Mutakabbir is an assistant professor in LLU's School of Pharmacy. Pranjal Patel is an instructor and Ara A. Chrissian is an associate professor in LLU's School of Medicine. Contact author: Lisa R. Roberts, lroberts@llu.edu . The authors have disclosed no potential conflicts of interest, financial or otherwise.
Alex Dubov
Brian Distelberg
Bridgette Peteet
Jacinda C Abdul-Mutakabbir
Susanne Montgomery
Pranjal Patel
Ara A Chrissian
Loma Linda University · US

Funding

UCLA Rapid, Relevant, Rigorous Implementation Science HubP30MH058107 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI Sung-Jae Lee · 1997 to 2026
$53.5M
NIMH NIH HHS P30 MH058107
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe purpose of this study was to elucidate characteristics of vaccine-hesitant nurses at two large Southern California medical centers where rates of COVID-19 vaccination were lower than expected.

methodsThis study is a secondary analysis of nurse participants in a cross-sectional study conducted at the two medical centers. Participants completed an online survey regarding their demographics; work setting and role characteristics; influenza vaccination history; COVID-19 knowledge and beliefs; and personal history of COVID-19 exposure, diagnosis, and disease impact (infection or death) on those closest to them.

resultsOf 869 nurse participants, most (78.6%) were vaccinated and 21.4% were unvaccinated; more than half of the unvaccinated participants reported being unwilling to be vaccinated ("vaccine hesitant"). The χ 2 comparisons revealed no significant differences between vaccinated and vaccine-hesitant nurses in terms of education, contact with COVID-19 patients, work environment, or having friends and family impacted by COVID-19. Binary logistic regression showed that nurses who had no history of recent influenza vaccination were 10 times more likely to be vaccine hesitant, those who had inaccurate knowledge about COVID-19 vaccines were seven times more likely to be vaccine hesitant, and younger nurses and those with a prior COVID-19 diagnosis were approximately three times more likely to be vaccine hesitant. Furthermore, 17.3% of all participants were unwilling to recommend COVID-19 vaccination to others.

conclusionThe findings offer a nuanced understanding of vaccine hesitancy among nurses and will be useful to the planning and development of policies, campaigns, and interventions aimed at increasing vaccination rates among nurses. Changing attitudes is essential, and particular attention must be paid to nurses who are unwilling to recommend vaccination to others. Effective interventions are needed.

Indexed as

COVID-19Influenza, HumanCOVID-19 TestingCOVID-19 VaccinesCross-Sectional StudiesHumansVaccinationVaccination HesitancyCOVID-19 Vaccines

Identifiers

PMID36201394
PMCPMC10866616
OpenAlexW4302424793

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.