ArticleHernia : the journal of hernias and abdominal wall surgery2022
Implementation of robot-assisted groin hernia repair diminishes the prospects of young surgeons' training: a nationwide register-based cohort study.
Article in Hernia : the journal of hernias and abdominal wall surgery, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- Is quantity quality? The impact of surgeon volume on outcomes in inguinal hernia repair: a quantitative systematic review.Hernia : the journal of hernias and abdominal wall surgery · 2025Pooled it
- Educational needs of the EAES young surgeons.Surgical endoscopy · 2024Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeRobot-assisted groin hernia repair is becoming more popular in recent years but may remove operations from surgical trainees. We aimed to investigate the educational level of the surgeons who performed robot-assisted groin hernia repair and the rate of supervision and compare this to open and laparoscopic groin hernia repair.
methodsThis register-based study was reported according to the RECORD statement and used linked data from the Danish Hernia Database and the Danish Patient Safety Authority's Online Register. We included surgeons that performed robot-assisted, laparoscopic, and/or open groin hernia repairs performed between January 1, 2015, and June 15, 2021 in Denmark.
resultsA total of 916 surgeons performing 43,856 groin hernia repairs were included in this study. Surgical specialists performed 98% of the robot-assisted groin hernia repairs, 89% of the laparoscopic repairs (p < 0.0001), and 54% of the Lichtenstein repairs (p < 0.0001). Only 5% of the robot-assisted groin hernia repairs were supervised compared with 11% of the laparoscopic repairs (p < 0.0001) and 28% of the open repairs (p < 0.0001).
conclusionAlmost all groin hernia repairs performed with the robot-assisted technique were performed by surgeons specialized in general surgery. The proportions of surgeons specialized in surgery were higher for robot-assisted operations compared with laparoscopic or open groin hernia surgery. Thus, our data suggest a lack of involvement of surgeons in training, and this diminishes the educational potential in the pool of groin hernia operations by the use of robot-assisted repairs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.