SynthesisDie Ophthalmologie2022
[Biomarkers in the treatment of retinal vein occlusion].
Synthesis in Die Ophthalmologie, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Long term efficacy and safety profile of dexamethasone intravitreal implant in retinal vein occlusions: a systematic review.Frontiers in medicine · 2024Pooled it
- Intravitreal Dexamethasone Implant in Retinal Vein Occlusion: A Pilot Study Exploring Baseline Ocular and Circulating Biomarkers.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Article
- Optimal Treatment of Retinal Vein Occlusion: An Updated Canadian Review and Recommendations.Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.) · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundRetinal vein occlusion, subdivided into central retinal and branch retinal vein occlusion, is one of the most frequent vascular diseases of the retina. Biomarkers of optical coherence tomography (OCT), OCT-angiography and (ultra-widefield) fluorescein angiography are of exceptional importance in the initial diagnosis and also in the treatment of complications associated with retinal vascular occlusion, particularly macular edema.
methodsA systematic literature review was carried out in PubMed with the keywords central retinal vein occlusion, branch retinal vein occlusion, biomarker, OCT, OCT angiography, ultra-widefield fluorescein angiography with prioritization of the most important aspects.
resultsRelevant biomarkers in OCT include central retinal thickness (CRT), macular fluid, the integrity of the photoreceptor bands (external limiting membrane and ellipsoid zone), disorganization of retinal inner layers (DRIL), hyperreflective foci, choroidal thickness and signs of ischemia, such as a prominent middle limiting membrane (p-MLM), paracentral acute middle maculopathy (PAMM) as well as hyperreflectivity of inner retinal layers (HIRL). The importance of OCT-angiography lies particularly in the assessment of microvascular alterations, especially vessel density in the deep retinal vascular plexus, the foveal avascular zone and of areas with no capillary perfusion. Biomarkers of ultra-widefield angiography, such as peripheral ischemia (ischemic index) and neovascularízation are essential with respect to treatment decisions for retinal laser.
conclusionA multitude of simple and complex biomarkers currently enable an effective individualized evaluation of treatment and prognosis in retinal vein occlusion. A shift from invasive to noninvasive biomarkers can be observed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.