Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36200805›Full record

ArticlePublic health reports (Washington, D.C. : 1974)

Duration of Behavioral Policy Interventions and Incidence of COVID-19 by Social Vulnerability of US Counties, April-December 2020.

Szu-Yu Zoe Kao, J Danielle Sharpe, Rashon I Lane, Rashid Njai, Russell F McCord, Aderonke S Ajiboye, Chandresh N Ladva, Linda Vo, Donatus U Ekwueme

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Public health reports (Washington, D.C. : 1974). The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 26% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Effectiveness of social distancing measures and lockdowns for reducing transmission of COVID-19 in non-healthcare, community-based settings.Philosophical transactions. Series A, Mathematical, physical, and engineering sciences · 2023
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Public health reports (Washington, D.C. : 1974)
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Szu-Yu Zoe KaoCDC COVID-19 Response Team, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-4987-3983
J Danielle SharpeCDC COVID-19 Response Team, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-1898-6202
Rashon I LaneCDC COVID-19 Response Team, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Rashid NjaiCDC COVID-19 Response Team, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Russell F McCordCDC COVID-19 Response Team, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Aderonke S AjiboyeCDC COVID-19 Response Team, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Chandresh N LadvaCDC COVID-19 Response Team, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Linda VoCDC COVID-19 Response Team, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-9425-915X
Donatus U EkwuemeCDC COVID-19 Response Team, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveState-issued behavioral policy interventions (BPIs) can limit community spread of COVID-19, but their effects on COVID-19 transmission may vary by level of social vulnerability in the community. We examined the association between the duration of BPIs and the incidence of COVID-19 across levels of social vulnerability in US counties.

methodsWe used COVID-19 case counts from USAFacts and policy data on BPIs (face mask mandates, stay-at-home orders, gathering bans) in place from April through December 2020 and the 2018 Social Vulnerability Index (SVI) from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. We conducted multilevel linear regression to estimate the associations between duration of each BPI and monthly incidence of COVID-19 (cases per 100 000 population) by SVI quartiles (grouped as low, moderate low, moderate high, and high social vulnerability) for 3141 US counties.

resultsHaving a BPI in place for longer durations (ie, ≥2 months) was associated with lower incidence of COVID-19 compared with having a BPI in place for <1 month. Compared with having no BPI in place or a BPI in place for <1 month, differences in marginal mean monthly incidence of COVID-19 per 100 000 population for a BPI in place for ≥2 months ranged from -4 cases in counties with low SVI to -401 cases in counties with high SVI for face mask mandates, from -31 cases in counties with low SVI to -208 cases in counties with high SVI for stay-at-home orders, and from -227 cases in counties with low SVI to -628 cases in counties with high SVI for gathering bans.

conclusionsEstablishing COVID-19 prevention measures for longer durations may help reduce COVID-19 transmission, especially in communities with high levels of social vulnerability.

Indexed as

COVID-19HumansIncidencePolicySocial VulnerabilityUnited StatesCOVID-19face mask mandatesgathering banssocial vulnerabilitystay-at-home orders

Identifiers

PMID36200805
PMCPMC9729715
OpenAlexW4302763068

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.