ReviewExpert opinion on drug discovery2022
Strategies for the drug discovery and development of taxane anticancer therapeutics.
Review in Expert opinion on drug discovery, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.
- Therapeutic Applications of Natural Products in Biomedicine and Pharmacotherapy.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Recent paclitaxel formulation strategies: expanding the therapeutic index by addressing biopharmaceutical and toxicity limitations.Archives of pharmacal research · 2026Review
- Anti-Cancer, Anti-Inflammatory, and Analgesic Effects ofFood science & nutrition · 2025Article
- Dendrimers: Patents for Alzheimer's Disease.Recent patents on nanotechnology · 2025Review
- Phytotherapeutics in Cancer: From Potential Drug Candidates to Clinical Translation.Current topics in medicinal chemistry · 2024Review
- Mechanism of Taxanes in the Treatment of Lung Cancer Based on Network Pharmacology and Molecular Docking.Current issues in molecular biology · 2023Article
- Recent advances in the strategic incorporation of fluorine into new-generation taxoid anticancer agents.Journal of fluorine chemistry · 2023Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionPaclitaxel and docetaxel have been extensively used in the clinic over the past three decades. Although the patents of these first-generation taxanes have expired, their clinical applications, particularly new formulations and combination therapies, are under active investigations. Inspired by the notable success of Abraxane and Lipusu, new formulations have been extensively developed. In parallel, to overcome multidrug resistance (MDR) and to eradicate cancer stem cells, immense efforts have been made on the discovery and development of new-generation taxanes with improved potency and superior pharmacological properties. AREAS COVERED: This review covers (a) natural sources of advanced intermediates used for semi-synthesis of taxane API, (b) new formulations, (c) the major issues of FDA approved taxanes, (d) the design and development of next-generation taxanes, (e) new mechanisms of action, and (f) a variety of taxane-based drug delivery systems. EXPERT OPINION: As the highly potent next-generation taxanes can eradicate cancer stem cells and overcome MDR, the priority is to develop these compounds as an integral part of cancer therapy, especially for pancreatic, colon and prostate cancers which hardly respond to checkpoint inhibitors. In order to mitigate undesirable side effects, the exploration of effective nanoformulations and tumor-targeted drug delivery systems are essential.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.