ArticleJAMA health forum2022
Therapeutic Value of Drugs Granted Accelerated Approval or Conditional Marketing Authorization in the US and Europe From 2007 to 2021.
Article in JAMA health forum, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
32 citing papers in PubMed.
- Technology profiles in FDA-approved new molecular entities, 2013-2024: a latent class analysis.Daru : journal of Faculty of Pharmacy, Tehran University of Medical Sciences · 2026Article
- Orphan Designation for Drugs Approved in the United States and European Union: A Comparative Analysis.Clinical pharmacology and therapeutics · 2026Article
- Clinical Development, Regulatory, and Reimbursement Review Duration of New Drugs in the US and European Countries.JAMA health forum · 2026Article
- The launch and diffusion of new patented medicines by therapeutic value.Health affairs scholar · 2026Article
- Accelerating cancer therapy review: a cross-sectional analysis of expedited approval in China, 2005-2021.BMC cancer · 2026Article
- Do conditional marketing authorisations actually accelerate patient access? Time-to-access of conditional vs. standard marketing authorisations in Italy, Spain, and Germany.Journal of pharmaceutical policy and practice · 2026Article
- FDA first to global follow-on: alignment in expedited oncology approvals across EMA, TGA, and PMDA.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2026Article
- Comparison of drug approvals of the FDA and EMA between 2013 and 2023.Naunyn-Schmiedeberg's archives of pharmacology · 2026Article
- How social pharmaceutical innovations are addressing problems of availability, accessibility and affordability of drugs for rare diseases.Orphanet journal of rare diseases · 2025Article
- Coverage with evidence development for medicines with insufficient evidence of clinical benefit: experience from the Netherlands.International journal of technology assessment in health care · 2025Article
- Are Therapeutically Important Drugs No Longer Available in Canada?Healthcare policy = Politiques de sante · 2025Article
- Current landscape of innovative drug development and regulatory support in China.Signal transduction and targeted therapy · 2025Review
- US FDA-accelerated approvals and subsequent withdrawals: influence on Japanese clinical oncology practice guidelines.Investigational new drugs · 2025Article
- Therapeutic value of oncology products with a conditional approval from Health Canada: a cross-sectional study.JRSM open · 2025Article
- Expedited Approval of Urgently Needed Drugs in China.JAMA health forum · 2025Article
- Drivers of innovation value: simulation for new drug pricing evaluation based on system dynamics modelling.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2025Article
- Therapeutic benefit of the most expensive drugs covered by Medicare and Medicaid.Journal of pharmaceutical policy and practice · 2025Article
- Design and Features of Pricing and Payment Schemes for Health Technologies: A Scoping Review and a Proposal for a Flexible Need-Driven Classification.PharmacoEconomics · 2025Article
- Disparities in the access to immune checkpoint inhibitors approved in the United States, the European Union and mainland China: a serial cross-sectional study.BMJ public health · 2025Article
- Fear of missing out: Drug availability in the United States vs Canada.Journal of managed care & specialty pharmacy · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Importance: The number of drugs approved through the accelerated approval or conditional marketing authorization pathways has increased with unclear evidence of their therapeutic value. Objectives: To assess the therapeutic value of drug indications granted accelerated approval in the US or conditional marketing authorization in the European Union (EU) overall and for cancer indications. Design, Setting, and Participants: This cohort study used the public databases of the US Food and Drug Administration and the European Medicines Agency to identify all drugs (initial and supplemental indications) granted accelerated approval in the US or conditional marketing authorization (initial indications only) in the EU between January 1, 2007, and December 31, 2021. Therapeutic value ratings were obtained from national health authorities in Germany, France, and Canada. Main Outcomes and Measures: Descriptive statistics were used to assess the proportion of accelerated approvals and conditional marketing authorizations overall and for cancer vs noncancer indications rated as having high added therapeutic value. Results: The cohort included 146 drug indications (94 first indications, 52 supplemental indications) in the US and 58 (all first indications) in the EU. Most drugs were approved for cancer (122 [83.6%] in the US; 40 [69.0%] in the EU). Therapeutic value ratings were available for 90 drug indications (61.6%) in the US and 56 (96.6%) in the EU. Overall, 35 drug indications granted accelerated approval (38.9%) and 21 granted conditional marketing authorization (37.5%) had high added therapeutic value in the US and EU, respectively, at the time of approval. The proportions of indications rated as having high added therapeutic value were 36.0% (27 of 75) for cancer vs 53.3% (8 of 15) for noncancer indications in the US and 30.8% (12 of 39) for cancer vs 52.9% (9 of 17) for noncancer indications in the EU. Conclusions and Relevance: In this cohort study, among new drug indications approved through the accelerated approval or conditional marketing authorization pathways in the US and Europe from 2007 to 2021, 38.9% and 37.5%, respectively, demonstrated high therapeutic value. A substantially lower proportion of cancer indications than noncancer indications were rated as having high therapeutic value. Policy makers and regulators should increase enforcement of timely postapproval study completion for drugs qualifying for these pathways.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.