Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36200590›Full record

ReviewAnnals of the New York Academy of Sciences2022

Music-based interventions in community settings: Navigating the tension between rigor and ecological validity.

Assal Habibi, Gunter Kreutz, Frank Russo, Mari Tervaniemi

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Music-based interventions for chronic pain management.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2026
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Music as a scientific metaphor for mind and brain.Neuroscience and biobehavioral reviews · 2026
    Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Assal HabibiBrain and Creativity Institute, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-1420-3568
Gunter KreutzDepartment of Music, Carl von Ossietzky University Oldenburg, Oldenburg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-9586-241X
Frank RussoDepartment of Psychology, Toronto Metropolitan University, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-2939-6358
Mari TervaniemiCognitive Brain Research Unit, Department of Psychology and Logopedics, Faculty of Medicine, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland.ORCID 0000-0002-9651-2929

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Empirical research of community-based music interventions has advanced to investigate the individual, social, and educational implications of arts-for-wellbeing practices. Here, we present the motivations, aims, hypotheses, and implications of this complex field of inquiry. We describe examples of recent large-scale investigations to reflect on the major methodological challenges. Community-based music interventions strike a balance between the empirical rigor of clinical trials and the demands of ecological validity. We argue that this balance should be viewed as an asset rather than a mere pragmatic compromise. We also offer some perspectives on best-practice models for effectively engaging in this type of work.

Indexed as

MusicHumansauditorycognitionhealthlearningmusicquality of lifetransferwell-being

Identifiers

PMID36200590
PMCPMC10092011

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.