Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36200515›Full record

ArticleGM crops & food2025

Multiplex CRISPR/Cas9-mediated genome editing to address drought tolerance in wheat.

Naglaa A Abdallah, Hany Elsharawy, Hamiss A Abulela, Roger Thilmony, Abdelhadi A Abdelhadi, Nagwa I Elarabi

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in GM crops & food, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 33 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
33citing papers in PubMed
7.4field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

33 citing papers in PubMed, 94 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Wheat's Up with CRISPR-Cas-Current Advances, Obstacles and Perspectives.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026
    Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Harnessing primary, secondary and tertiary genepools for durable wheat disease resistance.TAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik · 2025
    Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. The Role ofInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Naglaa A AbdallahDepartment of Genetics,Faculty of Agriculture, Cairo University, Giza, Egypt.ORCID 0000-0002-9290-5944
Hany ElsharawyDepartment of Genetics,Faculty of Agriculture, Cairo University, Giza, Egypt.
Hamiss A AbulelaChemistry Department, Faculty of Science, Cairo University, Giza, Egypt.
Roger ThilmonyUSDA-ARS Crop Improvement and Genetics Unit, Albany, California, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-6591-6699
Abdelhadi A AbdelhadiDepartment of Genetics,Faculty of Agriculture, Cairo University, Giza, Egypt.
Nagwa I ElarabiDepartment of Genetics,Faculty of Agriculture, Cairo University, Giza, Egypt.
Cairo University · EGAgricultural Research Service · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Genome editing tools have rapidly been adopted by plant scientists for crop improvement. Genome editing using a multiplex sgRNA-CRISPR/Cas9 genome editing system is a useful technique for crop improvement in monocot species. In this study, we utilized precise gene editing techniques to generate wheat 3'(2'), 5'-bisphosphate nucleotidase (

Indexed as

CRISPR-Cas SystemsDroughtsGene EditingPlants, Genetically ModifiedTriticumDrought ResistanceGenome, PlantMutationPlant LeavesPlant ProteinsPlant ProteinsCRISPR-Cas9drought toleranceSal1 genestomatawheat

Identifiers

PMID36200515
PMCPMC11702957
OpenAlexW4302292757

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.