Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36200044›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in cell and developmental biology2022

Muscle fibro-adipogenic progenitors from a single-cell perspective: Focus on their "virtual" secretome.

Elisa Negroni, Maria Kondili, Laura Muraine, Mona Bensalah, Gillian Sandra Butler-Browne, Vincent Mouly, Anne Bigot, Capucine Trollet

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in cell and developmental biology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 28 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. A who's who of cell types in skeletal muscle.Communications biology · 2026
    Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Elisa NegroniSorbonne Université, Inserm, Institut de Myologie, Centre de Recherche en Myologie, Paris, France.
Maria KondiliSorbonne Université, Inserm, Institut de Myologie, Centre de Recherche en Myologie, Paris, France.
Laura MuraineSorbonne Université, Inserm, Institut de Myologie, Centre de Recherche en Myologie, Paris, France.
Mona BensalahSorbonne Université, Inserm, Institut de Myologie, Centre de Recherche en Myologie, Paris, France.
Gillian Sandra Butler-BrowneSorbonne Université, Inserm, Institut de Myologie, Centre de Recherche en Myologie, Paris, France.
Vincent MoulySorbonne Université, Inserm, Institut de Myologie, Centre de Recherche en Myologie, Paris, France.
Anne BigotSorbonne Université, Inserm, Institut de Myologie, Centre de Recherche en Myologie, Paris, France.
Capucine TrolletSorbonne Université, Inserm, Institut de Myologie, Centre de Recherche en Myologie, Paris, France.
Centre de Recherche en MyologieInserm · FRInstitut de Myologie · FRSorbonne Université · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Skeletal muscle is a highly plastic tissue composed of a number of heterogeneous cell populations that, by interacting and communicating with each other, participate to the muscle homeostasis, and orchestrate regeneration and repair in healthy and diseased conditions. Although muscle regeneration relies on the activity of muscle stem cells (MuSCs), many other cellular players such as inflammatory, vascular and tissue-resident mesenchymal cells participate and communicate with MuSCs to sustain the regenerative process. Among them, Fibro-Adipogenic Progenitors (FAPs), a muscle interstitial stromal population, are crucial actors during muscle homeostasis and regeneration, interacting with MuSCs and other cellular players and dynamically producing and remodelling the extra-cellular matrix. Recent emerging single-cell omics technologies have resulted in the dissection of the heterogeneity of each cell populations within skeletal muscle. In this perspective we have reviewed the recent single-cell omics studies with a specific focus on FAPs in mouse and human muscle. More precisely, using the OutCyte prediction tool, we analysed the "virtual" secretome of FAPs, in resting and regenerating conditions, to highlight the potential of RNAseq data for the study of cellular communication.

Indexed as

cell-cell communicationextracellular matrixFAPsin silicoscRNAseqsecretomeskeletal muscle

Identifiers

PMID36200044
PMCPMC9527288
OpenAlexW4296353608

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.