Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36200015›Full record

ArticleEcancermedicalscience2022

Cervical cancer programme, Kenya, 2011-2020: lessons to guide elimination as a public health problem.

Valerian Mwenda, Woki Mburu, Joan-Paula Bor, Mary Nyangasi, Marc Arbyn, Steven Weyers, Philippe Tummers, Marleen Temmerman

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Ecancermedicalscience, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 37 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
37citing papers in PubMed
7.0field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

37 citing papers in PubMed, 50 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Safety and adherence to self-administered intravaginal 5-fluorouracil cream following cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) 2/3 treatment among HIV-positive women in Kenya: A phase 1 clinical trial.International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics · 2025
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Valerian MwendaNational Cancer Control Program, Ministry of Health, PO Box 30016-00100, Nairobi, Kenya.
Woki MburuNational Cancer Control Program, Ministry of Health, PO Box 30016-00100, Nairobi, Kenya.
Joan-Paula BorNational Cancer Control Program, Ministry of Health, PO Box 30016-00100, Nairobi, Kenya.
Mary NyangasiNational Cancer Control Program, Ministry of Health, PO Box 30016-00100, Nairobi, Kenya.
Marc ArbynUnit of Cancer Epidemiology, Belgian Cancer Centre, Sciensano, Brussels 1050, Belgium.
Steven WeyersDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent 9000, Belgium.
Philippe TummersDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent 9000, Belgium.
Marleen TemmermanCancer Research Institute Ghent (CRIG), Ghent 9000, Belgium.
Ministry of Health · KECancer Research Institute Ghent · BEGhent University Hospital · BESciensano (Belgium) · BE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Cervical cancer is the leading cause of cancer mortality in Kenya, with an estimated 3,200 deaths in 2020. Kenya has implemented cervical cancer interventions for more than a decade. We describe the evolution of the cervical cancer programme over the last 20 years and assess its performance. Methods: We searched the Ministry of Health's archives and website (2000-2021) for screening policy documents and assessed them using seven items: situational analysis, objectives, key result areas, implementation framework, resource considerations, monitoring and evaluation and definition of roles/responsibilities. In addition, a trend analysis was performed targeting screening and disease burden indicators in the period 2011-2020, using data from Kenya Health Information System and the Global Burden of Disease database. Findings: Policy guidance improved over time, but the implementation of screening was poor. Before 2016, a clear leadership and accountability structure was lacking; improvement occurred after the establishment of the National Cancer Control Program. The main health system gaps included the lack of a trained healthcare workforce and poor data collection. Annual screening coverage varied between <1% and 36% of the target population for the year for HIV-negative women and between <1% and 7% for HIV-positive women, from 2011 to 2020. Test positivity for visual inspection with acetic acid was below 5% for most of the period. Compliance to treatment of precancerous lesions ranged between 22% and 39%. The detection rate of cervical cancer ranged between 0.5% and 1.0%. The burden of invasive cervical cancer did not change significantly: world age-standardised incidence and mortality rates of 26.3-27.4 and 16.6-18.0/100,000 women-years, respectively; disability-adjusted life years of 579-624/100,000 life years. Conclusion: The Kenyan cervical cancer control programme suffered from inadequate health system strengthening and poor quality implementation. Evidence-based policy implementation and sustained health system strengthening are necessary to move towards cervical cancer elimination as a public health problem.

Indexed as

cervical cancereliminationKenyascreeningtrends

Identifiers

PMID36200015
PMCPMC9470178
OpenAlexW4293199977

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.