Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36200007›Full record

ArticleEcancermedicalscience2022

Spectrum and management of breast cancer patients with variant of uncertain significance mutations at a tertiary care centre in North India.

Abhenil Mittal, S V S Deo, Ajay Gogia, Atul Batra, Akash Kumar, Sandeep Bhoriwal, Koushik Sinha Deb, Ekta Dhamija, V L Ramprasad, Olufunmilayo Olopade and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Ecancermedicalscience, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Abhenil MittalDepartment of Medical Oncology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi 110029, India.
S V S DeoDepartment of Surgical Oncology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi 110029, India.
Ajay GogiaDepartment of Medical Oncology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi 110029, India.
Atul BatraDepartment of Medical Oncology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi 110029, India.
Akash KumarDepartment of Medical Oncology, National Cancer Institute, Jhajjar, Haryana 110029, India.
Sandeep BhoriwalDepartment of Surgical Oncology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi 110029, India.
Koushik Sinha DebDepartment of Psychiatry, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi 110029, India.
Ekta DhamijaDepartment of Radiodiagnosis, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi 110029, India.
V L RamprasadMedGenome Labs Ltd, Bengaluru, Karnataka 560099, India.
Olufunmilayo OlopadeCenter for Clinical Cancer Genetics and Global Health, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL 60637, USA.
Raja PramanikDepartment of Medical Oncology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi 110029, India.
All India Institute of Medical Sciences · INCancer Genetics (United States) · USCancer Institute (WIA) · INSciGenom Labs (India) · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: The spectrum and significance of Variants of Uncertain Significance (VUS) mutations in breast cancer predisposition genes is poorly defined in the Indian population. Methods: All new female breast cancer patients from 1 March 2019 to 28 February 2020 were screened. Those providing informed consent and without previous genetic testing were recruited. Multigene panel testing (107 genes) by next-generation sequencing was performed for all patients. Descriptive statistics was used to describe the spectrum of VUS mutations. Results: Out of 236 patients recruited in the study, a VUS was detected in 89 patients (37.71%). VUS pathogenic ratio was 2.02. A total of 121 different VUS mutations in 40 different genes were detected. Fourteen patients (15.7%) had a VUS in high penetrance genes and 36 VUS mutations (29.8%) were detected in one of the genes involved in homologous recombination repair pathway. No therapeutic interventions were done based on VUS. Conclusions: In this large prospective study of genetic determinants of breast cancer from India, a high prevalence of VUS (37.71%) was detected with 15.7% patients having a VUS in high penetrance genes. More evidence needs to be generated from larger multicentric studies to better understand the implications of these genetic variants and enable their reclassification.

Indexed as

breast cancerIndianext-generation sequencingvariant of uncertain significance

Identifiers

PMID36200007
PMCPMC9470172
OpenAlexW4289338815

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.