ArticleComputational intelligence and neuroscience2022
Computational Analysis of Influencing Factors and Multiple Scoring Systems of Stone Clearance Rate after Flexible Ureteroscopic Lithotripsy.
Article in Computational intelligence and neuroscience, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Effectiveness and safety of external physical vibration lithecbole for upper urinary stone expulsion: a systematic review and meta-analysis.The Canadian journal of urology · 2026Pooled it
- Multi-target litholytic strategy toward calcium oxalate stone therapy: a fundamental study.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2026Article
- Impact of preoperative double-J stent placement on stone recurrence following flexible ureteroscopic lithotripsy.The Journal of international medical research · 2025Article
- Applications of flexible ureteroscope lithotripsy with negative pressure suction and percutaneous nephrolithotomy in the treatment of 2-3 cm diameter renal calculi.Clinical and experimental nephrology · 2025Article
- Percutaneous nephrolithotomy or flexible ureteral lithotripsy, which one is better for patients with upper ureteral calculi of 1.5-2.0 cm in diameter.BMC urology · 2024Article
- Surgical outcomes and postoperative hemorrhage risk of percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) for deer horn shaped stones analyzed by Lasso regression.American journal of translational research · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Our research aims at the analysis of various stone scoring systems which are referred to as STONE scoring system (SSS) in this study. GUY's scoring system and RUSS scoring system (RSS) are utilized to predict stone-free status (SFS) after surgery and problems after percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) for harder stones. The data of 68 patients with renal calculi who received FURL in Ren Ji Hospital from Jan 2020 to Mar 2021 are collected as the study subjects. There were 44 male and 24 female patients, with an average age of 55.6 ± 11.4 years. Reliability analysis of related influencing factors (IF) of stone clearance rate (SCR) and multiple scoring systems after flexible ureteroscopic lithotripsy (FURL) was performed. Relevant factors with statistical significance for postoperative SCR were selected for logistic regression analysis (RA). According to the SSS score, GSS classification, and RUSS score, the SCR after FURL was statistically analyzed. The results showed that the
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.