Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36199943›Full record

ReviewJournal of contemporary brachytherapy2022

Prediction models for brachytherapy-induced rectal toxicity in patients with locally advanced pelvic cancers: a systematic review.

Fariba Tohidinezhad, Yves Willems, Maaike Berbee, Evert Van Limbergen, Frank Verhaegen, Andre Dekker, Alberto Traverso

Registry-linked trialAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of contemporary brachytherapy, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07065175 (KANGFUPEN), which is not on this map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07065175 phase2not yet recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2025, after this paper: background citation

KANGFUPEN (Liquid Dressing) for the Treatment of Chronic Radiation-Induced Rectal Injury: A Prospective, Single-Arm, Multicenter Study

TypeinterventionalSponsorPeking Union Medical College HospitalRan2025 to 2029Enrolled65ConditionsChronic Radiation-induced ProctitisArmsKangfupen (liquid dressing) retention enema administration
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Fariba Tohidinezhad *Department of Radiation Oncology (Maastro Clinic), School for Oncology and Reproduction (GROW), Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Yves Willems *Department of Radiation Oncology (Maastro Clinic), School for Oncology and Reproduction (GROW), Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Maaike BerbeeDepartment of Radiation Oncology (Maastro Clinic), School for Oncology and Reproduction (GROW), Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Evert Van LimbergenDepartment of Radiation Oncology (Maastro Clinic), School for Oncology and Reproduction (GROW), Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Frank VerhaegenDepartment of Radiation Oncology (Maastro Clinic), School for Oncology and Reproduction (GROW), Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Andre DekkerDepartment of Radiation Oncology (Maastro Clinic), School for Oncology and Reproduction (GROW), Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Alberto TraversoDepartment of Radiation Oncology (Maastro Clinic), School for Oncology and Reproduction (GROW), Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: Rectal toxicity remains a major threat to quality of life of patients, who receive brachytherapy to the abdominal pelvic area. Estimating the risk of toxicity development is essential to maximize therapeutic benefit without impairing rectal function. This study aimed to abstract and evaluate studies, which have developed prediction models for rectal toxicity after brachytherapy (BT) in patients with pelvic cancers. Material and methods: To identify relevant studies since 1995, MEDLINE database was searched on August 31, 2021, using terms related to "pelvic cancers", "brachytherapy", "prediction models", and "rectal toxicity". Papers were excluded if model specifications were not reported. Risk of bias was assessed using prediction model risk of bias assessment tool. Results: Thirty models ( Conclusions: Existing models have limited clinical application due to poor quality of methodology. The following key issues should be considered in future studies: 1) Measuring patient-reported outcomes to address underestimation of true frequencies of rectal toxicity events; 2) Giving higher priority to reliable dose-volume parameters; 3) Avoiding overfitting by considering an event per candidate predictor rate ≥ 20; 4) Calculating detailed performance measures.

Indexed as

machine learningprostatic neoplasmsradiation injuriesrectal neoplasmsuterine cervical neoplasms

Identifiers

PMID36199943
PMCPMC9528824

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.