Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36199849›Full record

ArticleMateria socio-medica2022

Prenatal Ultrasound Screening and Women's Expectations: an Original Study.

Anna Glynou, Dionysios Galatis, Kalliopi Christakakou-Fotiadi, Vassilis Yalelis, Ioannis E Varvarigos, Kondylios Antonios, Sarella Angeliki, Eleftheriades Makarios, Chasalevri Eirini, Koukaki Maria and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Materia socio-medica, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Anna GlynouFourth Department of Nursing/Midwifery, Maternity Hospital Elena Venizelou, Athens, Greece.
Dionysios GalatisDepartment of Ob/Gyn, Helena Venizelou, General and Maternity Hospital of Athens ,(Greece.
Kalliopi Christakakou-FotiadiDepartment of Law, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens. Greece.
Vassilis YalelisDepartment of Ob/Gyn, Helena Venizelou, General and Maternity Hospital of Athens ,(Greece.
Ioannis E VarvarigosPrenatal Unit, Maternity Hospital Elena Venizelou, Athens, Greece.
Kondylios AntoniosPrenatal Unit, Maternity Hospital Elena Venizelou, Athens, Greece.
Sarella AngelikiMidwifery Department, Faculty of Health and Caring Sciences, University of West Attica, Greece.
Eleftheriades MakariosSecond Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Aretaieion Hospital, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Greece.
Chasalevri EiriniSecond Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Aretaieion Hospital, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Greece.
Koukaki MariaFourth Department of Nursing/Midwifery, Maternity Hospital Elena Venizelou, Athens, Greece.
Salakos NicolaosSecond Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Aretaieion Hospital, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Greece.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Prenatal screening offers crucial information about the pregnancy, although sometimes brings forth ethical issues and potentially difficult decisions for pregnant women. Ultrasound screening during pregnancy is both of particular importance and a great challenge. Objective: The objective of this study is to assess women's knowledge and expectations regarding prenatal ultrasound screening in Greece. Methods: The study was conducted between May 2019 and January 2020. Three hundred pregnant women >18 years of age with complete antenatal routine screening, were invited to participate. The questionnaire contained sociodemographic and obstetric history information and highlighted the background knowledge of pregnant women in prenatal screening. Results: In this study, women with university or technological education mentioned in a greater proportion the importance of prenatal screening regarding prevention and treatment of intrauterine diseases. The belief that the pain or sorrow to give birth to a disabled child or one with a genetic disorder might lead parents to the decision to terminate the pregnancy, was supported more by women with a higher educational level. Conclusion: Pregnant women place a great deal of trust in their physician, as a source of information for the fetal well-being. The majority consider prenatal testing mandatory for that matter. Finally, an association between women who abide with prenatal screening and their educational level was noted. Thus, it's more common women who have a higher educational level to seek prenatal screening, than those with lower education level.

Indexed as

bioethicsinformed consentpregnancyprenatal screeningultrasound scan

Identifiers

PMID36199849
PMCPMC9478537

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.