Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36199814›Full record

ArticleClinical and translational radiation oncology2022

Reduced-dose WBRT combined with SRS for 1-4 brain metastases aiming at minimizing neurocognitive function deterioration without compromising brain tumor control.

Toshimichi Nakano, Hidefumi Aoyama, Shunsuke Onodera, Hiroshi Igaki, Yasuo Matsumoto, Ayae Kanemoto, Shigetoshi Shimamoto, Masayuki Matsuo, Hidekazu Tanaka, Natsuo Oya and 8 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical and translational radiation oncology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors at 10 institutions in 1 country.

Toshimichi NakanoDepartment of Radiology and Radiation Oncology, Niigata University Graduate School of Medical and Dental Sciences, Niigata, Japan.
Hidefumi AoyamaDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Hokkaido University Faculty of Medicine, Sapporo, Japan.
Shunsuke OnoderaDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Hokkaido Cancer Center, Sapporo, Japan.
Hiroshi IgakiDepartment of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.
Yasuo MatsumotoDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Niigata Cancer Center Hospital, Niigata, Japan.
Ayae KanemotoDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Niigata Cancer Center Hospital, Niigata, Japan.
Shigetoshi ShimamotoDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Osaka General Medical Center, Osaka, Japan.
Masayuki MatsuoDepartment of Radiology, Gifu University Graduate School of Medicine, Gifu, Japan.
Hidekazu TanakaDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Yamaguchi University Graduate School of Medicine, Ube, Japan.
Natsuo OyaDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Life Sciences, Kumamoto University, Kumamoto, Japan.
Tomohiko MatsuyamaDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Life Sciences, Kumamoto University, Kumamoto, Japan.
Atsushi OhtaDepartment of Radiology and Radiation Oncology, Niigata University Graduate School of Medical and Dental Sciences, Niigata, Japan.
Katsuya MaruyamaDepartment of Radiology and Radiation Oncology, Niigata University Graduate School of Medical and Dental Sciences, Niigata, Japan.
Takahiro TanakaClinical and Translational Research Center, Niigata University Medical and Dental Hospital, Niigata, Japan.
Nobutaka KitamuraClinical and Translational Research Center, Niigata University Medical and Dental Hospital, Niigata, Japan.
Kohei AkazawaDepartment of Medical Informatics, Niigata University Medical and Dental Hospital, Niigata, Japan.
Katsuya MaebayashiDivision of Radiation Oncology, Nippon Medical School Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.
Japanese Radiation Oncology Study Group 13-1 (JROSG13-1) Investigators
Niigata University · JPNiigata University Medical and Dental Hospital · JPKumamoto University · JPNiigata Cancer Center Hospital · JPGifu University · JPHokkaido University · JPNippon Medical School Hospital · JPOsaka City General Hospital · JPTokyo National Hospital · JPYamaguchi University · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background and purpose: To minimize cognitive decline without increasing brain tumor recurrence (BTR) by reduced-dose whole-brain radiotherapy (RD-WBRT) (25 Gy, 10 fractions) + stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) in patients with ≤ 4 brain metastases. Materials and methods: Eligible patients with ≤ 4 brain metastases on contrast-enhanced MRI and Karnofsky Performance Status ≥ 70. The primary endpoint was the non-inferiority of BTR at distant sites in the brain (BTR-distant)-free survival at 6 months compared to that of the standard dose (SD)-WBRT (30 Gy, 10 fractions) + SRS arm in a randomized clinical trial (JROSG99-1) of SRS with/without SD-WBRT. Secondary endpoints included BTR at any brain sites (BTR-all) and neurocognitive function assessed by a six-test standardized battery. Results: Forty patients from seven institutions were enrolled (median age 69 years). The primary tumor site was a lung in 28 patients; 20 patients had a solitary brain metastasis. The median survival time was 19.0 months (95 %CI: 13.8 %-27.5 %). The BTR-distant-free survival at 6 months was 76.9 % (59.5 %-87.7 %), which is comparable to that of historical control although predetermined non-inferiority (>71 %) could not be confirmed (p = 0.16). The cumulative incidence of BTR-all at 6 months accounting for the competing risk of death was 23.0 % (11.4-37.1), which was not worse than that of historical control (p = 0.774). The frequency of the cumulative incidence of persistent cognitive decline at 6 months was 48.6 % under the [>2.0 SD in ≥ 1 test] definition. Conclusions: RD-WBRT may yield comparable intracranial tumor control when combined with SRS, and may reduce the risk of neurocognitive decline compared to that after SD-WBRT.

Indexed as

Brain metastasesCognitionRadiationRecurrenceStereotactic radiosurgeryWhole brain

Identifiers

PMID36199814
PMCPMC9529504
OpenAlexW4297374358

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.