Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36199808›Full record

ArticleSAGE open medical case reports2022

Laparoscopic choledochotomy and choledochoduodenostomy for the management of persistent common bile duct stones.

Telvinderjit Singh Harbhajan Singh, Sereibanndith Seang, Susmit Prosun Roy, Adeeb Majid

Open access · goldAbstract readCase Reports
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in SAGE open medical case reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 48% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Telvinderjit Singh Harbhajan SinghDepartment of Surgery, Calvary Mater Hospital, Newcastle, NSW, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8755-3852
Sereibanndith SeangDepartment of Surgery, Calvary Mater Hospital, Newcastle, NSW, Australia.
Susmit Prosun RoyDepartment of Surgery, Calvary Mater Hospital, Newcastle, NSW, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6443-6514
Adeeb MajidDepartment of Surgery, Calvary Mater Hospital, Newcastle, NSW, Australia.
Calvary Mater Newcastle Hospital · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Choledochotomy and choledochoduodenostomy were commonly used technique in the early twentieth century to extract bile duct stones. Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography and sphincterotomy revolutionised the scenario and is currently the preferred first-line option for managing choledocholithiasis. However, in certain circumstances, where endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography fails, choledochotomy and choledochoduodenostomy are the only available options. We present the case of an 86-year-old female with a background of multiple previous presentations with biliary sepsis and ascending cholangitis requiring multiple endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatographies that failed to remove all stones in the common bile duct. She underwent a laparoscopic choledochotomy and choledochoduodenostomy that successfully resolved her common bile duct obstruction. Laparoscopic choledochotomy and choledochoduodenostomy reduce the length of hospital stay and help to minimise complications associated with open surgery.

Indexed as

choledochoduodenostomycholedocholithiasisCholedochotomylaparoscopic

Identifiers

PMID36199808
PMCPMC9527980
OpenAlexW4302761468

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.