Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36199778›Full record

ArticleComputational and mathematical methods in medicine2022

Survival Prediction of Children Undergoing Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation Using Different Machine Learning Classifiers by Performing Chi-Square Test and Hyperparameter Optimization: A Retrospective Analysis.

Ishrak Jahan Ratul, Ummay Habiba Wani, Mirza Muntasir Nishat, Abdullah Al-Monsur, Abrar Mohammad Ar-Rafi, Fahim Faisal, Mohammad Ridwan Kabir

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Computational and mathematical methods in medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Systemic lupus erythematosus with high disease activity identification based on machine learning.Inflammation research : official journal of the European Histamine Research Society ... [et al.] · 2023
    Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Ishrak Jahan RatulDepartment of EEE, Islamic University of Technology, Gazipur, Bangladesh.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8446-7094
Ummay Habiba WaniDepartment of EEE, Islamic University of Technology, Gazipur, Bangladesh.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2894-3962
Mirza Muntasir NishatDepartment of EEE, Islamic University of Technology, Gazipur, Bangladesh.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0853-0319
Abdullah Al-MonsurDepartment of EEE, Islamic University of Technology, Gazipur, Bangladesh.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6124-4971
Abrar Mohammad Ar-RafiDepartment of EEE, Islamic University of Technology, Gazipur, Bangladesh.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1799-078X
Fahim FaisalDepartment of EEE, Islamic University of Technology, Gazipur, Bangladesh.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9835-6299
Mohammad Ridwan KabirDepartment of CSE, Islamic University of Technology, Gazipur, Bangladesh.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9631-1836

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Bone marrow transplant (BMT) is an effective surgical treatment for bone marrow-related disorders. However, several associated risk factors can impair long-term survival after BMT. Machine learning (ML) technologies have been proven useful in survival prediction of BMT receivers along with the influences that limit their resilience. In this study, an efficient classification model predicting the survival of children undergoing BMT is presented using a public dataset. Several supervised ML methods were investigated in this regard with an 80-20 train-test split ratio. To ensure prediction with minimal time and resources, only the top 11 out of the 59 dataset features were considered using Chi-square feature selection method. Furthermore, hyperparameter optimization (HPO) using the grid search cross-validation (GSCV) technique was adopted to increase the accuracy of prediction. Four experiments were conducted utilizing a combination of default and optimized hyperparameters on the original and reduced datasets. Our investigation revealed that the top 11 features of HPO had the same prediction accuracy (94.73%) as the entire dataset with default parameters, however, requiring minimal time and resources. Hence, the proposed approach may aid in the development of a computer-aided diagnostic system with satisfactory accuracy and minimal computation time by utilizing medical data records.

Indexed as

Hematopoietic Stem Cell TransplantationMachine LearningChildChi-Square DistributionHumansRetrospective StudiesSupervised Machine Learning

Identifiers

PMID36199778
PMCPMC9527434

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.