Trial reportComputational and mathematical methods in medicine2022
Predictive Models for Knee Pain in Middle-Aged and Elderly Individuals Based on Machine Learning Methods.
Trial report in Computational and mathematical methods in medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.
- Article
- Development and validation of a simple nomogram for predicting knee osteoarthritis using movement evoked pain in a community setting.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Utilizing Artificial Intelligence for the Diagnosis, Assessment, and Management of Chronic Pain.Journal of biomedical physics & engineering · 2025Review
- Machine learning-based prediction of knee pain risk using lipid metabolism biomarkers: a prospective cohort study from CHARLS.Frontiers in physiology · 2025Article
- Applications of Artificial Intelligence in Pain Medicine.Current pain and headache reports · 2024Review
- Prediction of knee joint pain in Tai Chi practitioners: a cross-sectional machine learning approach.BMJ open · 2023Article
- Prediction of posttraumatic functional recovery in middle-aged and older patients through dynamic ensemble selection modeling.Frontiers in public health · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Aim: This study used machine learning methods to develop a prediction model for knee pain in middle-aged and elderly individuals. Methods: A total of 5386 individuals above 45 years old were obtained from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey. Participants were randomly divided into a training set and a test set at a 7 : 3 ratio. The training set was used to create a prediction model, whereas the test set was used to validate the proposed model. We constructed multiple predictive models based on three machine learning methods: logistic regression, random forest, and Extreme Gradient Boosting. The model performance was evaluated by areas under the receiver (AUC), sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value. Additionally, we created a simplified nomogram based on logistic regression for better clinical application. Results: About 31.4% (1690) individuals were with self-reported knee pain. The logistic regression showed that female gender (odds ratio [OR] = 1.28), pain elsewhere (OR = 4.64), and body mass index (OR = 1.05) were significantly associated with increased risk of knee pain. In the test set, the logistic regression (AUC = 0.71) showed similar but slightly higher accuracy than the random forest (AUC = 0.70), while the performance of the Extreme Gradient Boosting model was less reliable (AUC = 0.59). Based on mean decrease accuracy, the most important first five predictions were pain elsewhere, waist circumference, body mass index, age, and gender. Additionally, the most important first five predictions with the highest mean decrease Gini index were pain elsewhere, body mass index, waist circumference, triglycerides, and age. The nomogram model showed good discrimination ability with an AUC of 0.75 (0.73-0.77), a sensitivity of 0.72, specificity of 0.71, a positive predictive value of 0.45, and a negative predictive value of 0.88. Conclusion: This study proposed a convenient nomogram tool to evaluate the risk of knee pain for the middle-aged and elderly US population in primary care. All the input variables can be easily obtained in a clinical setting, and no additional radiologic assessments were required.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.