Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36199676›Full record

ArticleCase reports in otolaryngology2022

Clinical Controversy Surrounding the Differential Diagnosis of Branchiogenic Carcinoma.

Alexander Karatzanis, Kleanthi Mylopotamitaki, Eleni Lagoudaki, Emmanuel Prokopakis, Sofia Agelaki

Open access · goldAbstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in Case reports in otolaryngology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 30% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Current approach to branchial remnants in the neck.Romanian journal of morphology and embryology = Revue roumaine de morphologie et embryologie
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Alexander KaratzanisDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, School of Medicine, University of Crete, Heraklion, Greece.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3196-2176
Kleanthi MylopotamitakiDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, General Hospital of Heraklion "Venizeleio-Pananeio,", Heraklion, Crete, Greece.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8484-4029
Eleni LagoudakiDepartment of Pathology, University General Hospital of Heraklion, Heraklion, Greece.
Emmanuel ProkopakisDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, School of Medicine, University of Crete, Heraklion, Greece.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1208-1990
Sofia AgelakiDepartment of Medical Oncology, University General Hospital of Heraklion, Heraklion, Greece.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7850-0457
University of Crete · GRUniversity Hospital of Heraklion · GR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Clinical evaluation, differential diagnosis, and management of a neck mass constitute commonly encountered problems for the head and neck surgeon. An asymptomatic neck mass in adults may be the only clinical sign of head and neck cancer. A 50-year-old female patient presented with a painless, slowly enlarging, left lateral neck lump. Ultrasonography described a possible lymph node with cystic degeneration, and fine needle aspiration biopsy only detected atypical cells of squamous epithelium. An open biopsy under general anesthesia was performed. Histopathological findings suggested the diagnosis of lymph node infiltration by squamous cell carcinoma of an unknown primary site, but differential diagnosis also included branchiogenic carcinoma arising in a branchial cleft cyst. A diagnostic algorithm for metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of an unknown primary site was followed, including positron emission tomography with computed tomography. The patient underwent panendoscopy and bilateral tonsillectomy, and an ipsilateral p16 positive tonsillar squamous cell carcinoma was detected. Further appropriate management followed. The existence of true branchiogenic carcinoma is controversial. When such a diagnosis is contemplated, every effort should be made to detect a possible primary site. Branchiogenic carcinoma, if exists at all, remains a diagnosis of exclusion.

Identifiers

PMID36199676
PMCPMC9529529
OpenAlexW4297081023

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.