Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36199556›Full record

ArticleNano futures2022

Magnetic nanoparticles and magnetic particle spectroscopy-based bioassays: a 15 year recap.

Kai Wu, Jinming Liu, Vinit Kumar Chugh, Shuang Liang, Renata Saha, Venkatramana D Krishna, Maxim C-J Cheeran, Jian-Ping Wang

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nano futures, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 39 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Magnetic nanoparticles for cancer theranostics.Biomedical physics & engineering express · 2026
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Kai WuDepartment of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN 55455, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-9444-6112
Jinming LiuDepartment of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN 55455, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-4313-5816
Vinit Kumar ChughDepartment of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN 55455, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0001-7818-7811
Shuang LiangDepartment of Chemical Engineering and Materials Science, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN 55455, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0003-1491-2839
Renata SahaDepartment of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN 55455, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-0389-0083
Venkatramana D KrishnaDepartment of Veterinary Population Medicine, University of Minnesota, St Paul, MN 55108, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-1980-5525
Maxim C-J CheeranDepartment of Veterinary Population Medicine, University of Minnesota, St Paul, MN 55108, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-5331-4746
Jian-Ping WangDepartment of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN 55455, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0003-2815-6624
University of Minnesota · US

Funding

A SARS-CoV-2 Breathalyzer for Direct Virus DetectionR42DE030832 · NIDCR · AEROSOL DEVICES, INC. · PI KEADY, PATRICIA BEA · 2021 to 2021
$254k
NIDCR NIH HHS R42 DE030832
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Magnetic nanoparticles (MNPs) have unique physical and chemical properties, such as high surface area to volume ratio and size-related magnetism, which are completely different from their bulk materials. Benefiting from the facile synthesis and chemical modification strategies, MNPs have been widely studied for applications in nanomedicine. Herein, we firstly summarized the designs of MNPs from the perspectives of materials and physicochemical properties tailored for biomedical applications. Magnetic particle spectroscopy (MPS), first reported in 2006, has flourished as an independent platform for many biological and biomedical applications. It has been extensively reported as a versatile platform for a variety of bioassays along with the artificially designed MNPs, where the MNPs serve as magnetic nanoprobes to specifically probe target analytes from fluid samples. In this review, the mechanisms and theories of different MPS platforms realizing volumetric- and surface-based bioassays are discussed. Some representative works of MPS platforms for applications such as disease diagnosis, food safety and plant pathology monitoring, drug screening, thrombus maturity assessments are reviewed. At the end of this review, we commented on the rapid growth and booming of MPS-based bioassays in its first 15 years. We also prospected opportunities and challenges that portable MPS devices face in the rapidly growing demand for fast, inexpensive, and easy-to-use biometric techniques.

Indexed as

bioassaydisease diagnosisfood safetymagnetic nanoparticlemagnetic particle spectroscopypoint-of-care

Identifiers

PMID36199556
PMCPMC9531898
OpenAlexW4220698524

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.