Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36199515›Full record

ArticleShoulder & elbow2022

Treatment of acute distal biceps tendon ruptures - A survey of the British Elbow and Shoulder Society surgical membership.

M J Baldwin, A C Watts, C A Peach, J Phadnis, H Singh, S E Gwilym

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Shoulder & elbow, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 38% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

M J BaldwinOxford Trauma and Emergency Care, Nuffield Department of Orthopaedics, Rheumatology and Musculoskeletal Sciences (NDORMS), University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8790-9975
A C WattsUpper Limb Unit, Wrightington Hospital, Wigan, UK.
C A PeachManchester Shoulder and Elbow Unit, Manchester University Foundation NHS Trust, Manchester, UK.
J PhadnisBrighton & Sussex Medical School, Brighton & Sussex University Hospitals, Brighton, UK.
H SinghLeicester Shoulder & Elbow Unit, University Hospitals of Leicester NHS Trust, Leicester, UK.
S E GwilymOxford Trauma and Emergency Care, Nuffield Department of Orthopaedics, Rheumatology and Musculoskeletal Sciences (NDORMS), University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Nuffield Orthopaedic Centre · GBBrighton and Sussex Medical School · GBManchester University NHS Foundation Trust · GBUniversity Hospitals of Leicester NHS Trust · GBWrightington Hospital · GB

Funding

The Dunhill Medical Trust DMT/RCS604
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Acute distal biceps tendon ruptures result in weakness and deformity. While in other jurisdictions the rate of surgical repair has outpaced rises in incidence, UK practice for distal biceps tendon ruptures is unknown. The aim of this survey was to characterise current UK clinical practice. Methods: An online survey was sent to the surgeon members of the British Elbow and Shoulder Society. Questions covered respondent demographics, clinical decision making, surgical experience and willingness to be involved in future research. Results: A total of 242 surgeons responded; 99% undertook acute distal biceps tendon repairs with 83% repairing at least half of all distal biceps tendon ruptures, and 84% of surgeons would have their own, hypothetical, acute distal biceps tendon rupture repaired in their dominant arm and 67% for their non-dominant arm. Patient age, occupation and restoration of strength were the commonest factors underpinning a recommendation of surgical fixation. Most surgeons (87%) supported a national trial to study operative and non-operative treatments. Conclusions: UK upper limb surgeons currently advise surgical repair of acute distal biceps tendon ruptures for the majority of their patients. This is despite a paucity of evidence to support improved outcomes following surgical, rather than non-operative, management. There is a clear need for robust clinical evaluation in this area.

Indexed as

Distal biceps tendonsurveytendon rupture

Identifiers

PMID36199515
PMCPMC9527480
OpenAlexW3188827299

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.