Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36199512›Full record

ArticleShoulder & elbow2022

Rehabilitation following rotator cuff repair: A survey exploring clinical equipoise among surgical members of the British Elbow and Shoulder Society.

Bruno Mazuquin, Marcus Bateman, Alba Realpe, Steve Drew, Jonathan Rees, Chris Littlewood

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Shoulder & elbow, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Bruno MazuquinDepartment of Health professions, Faculty of Health and Education, Manchester Metropolitan University, Manchester, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1566-9551
Marcus BatemanDerby Shoulder Unit, University Hospitals Derby & Burton NHS Foundation Trust, Derby, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3203-506X
Alba RealpePopulation Health Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.
Steve DrewUniversity Hospitals Coventry and Warwickshire, Coventry, UK.
Jonathan ReesNuffield Department of Orthopaedics, Rheumatology and Musculoskeletal Science, University of Oxford and NIHR Oxford Biomedical Research Centre, Oxford, UK.
Chris LittlewoodDepartment of Health professions, Faculty of Health and Education, Manchester Metropolitan University, Manchester, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7703-727X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: We investigated clinical equipoise across surgical members of the British Elbow and Shoulder Society (BESS) in relation to rehabilitation following rotator cuff repair. Method: An online survey explored clinical equipoise regarding early patient-directed versus standard rehabilitation after rotator cuff repair to inform the design of a national randomised controlled trial (RCT). It described different clinical scenarios relating to patient age, tear size, location and whether other patient-related and intra-operative factors would influence equipoise. Results: 76 surgeons completed the survey. 81% agreed/ strongly agreed that early mobilisation might benefit recovery; 57% were neutral/ disagreed that this approach risks re-tear. 87% agreed/ strongly agreed that there is clinical uncertainty about the effectiveness of different approaches to rehabilitation. As age of the patient and tear size increased, the proportion of respondents who would agree to recruit and accept the outcome of randomisation reduced, and this was compounded if subscapularis was torn. Other factors that influenced equipoise were diabetes and non-secure repair. Conclusion: Surgical members of BESS recognise uncertainty about the effectiveness of different approaches to rehabilitation following rotator cuff repair. We identified a range of factors that influence clinical equipoise that will be considered in the design of a new RCT.

Indexed as

equipoiserehabilitationrotator cuff repairsurvey

Identifiers

PMID36199512
PMCPMC9527485

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.