Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36199318›Full record

ArticleRSC advances2022

Differential pulse voltammetry and chronoamperometry as analytical tools for epinephrine detection using a tyrosinase-based electrochemical biosensor.

Sylwia Baluta, Francesca Meloni, Kinga Halicka, Adam Szyszka, Antonio Zucca, Maria Itria Pilo, Joanna Cabaj

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in RSC advances, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
7.8field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 98 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Electrochemical Detection of HNanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Article
  10. 2D/1D VSeMikrochimica acta · 2024
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Recent advances of additively manufactured noninvasive kinematic biosensors.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2023
    Review
  19. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Sylwia BalutaFaculty of Chemistry, Wrocław University of Science and Technology Wybrzeże Wyspiańskiego 27 50-370 Wrocław Poland sylwia.baluta@pwr.edu.pl.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2090-1650
Francesca MeloniDepartment of Chemistry and Pharmacy, University of Sassari Via Vienna 2 07100 Sassari Italy.
Kinga HalickaFaculty of Chemistry, Wrocław University of Science and Technology Wybrzeże Wyspiańskiego 27 50-370 Wrocław Poland sylwia.baluta@pwr.edu.pl.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2700-0775
Adam SzyszkaFaculty of Microsystem Electronics and Photonics, Wrocław University of Science and Technology Wybrzeże Wyspiańskiego 27 50-370 Wrocław Poland.
Antonio ZuccaDepartment of Chemistry and Pharmacy, University of Sassari Via Vienna 2 07100 Sassari Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4423-9382
Maria Itria PiloDepartment of Chemistry and Pharmacy, University of Sassari Via Vienna 2 07100 Sassari Italy.
Joanna CabajFaculty of Chemistry, Wrocław University of Science and Technology Wybrzeże Wyspiańskiego 27 50-370 Wrocław Poland sylwia.baluta@pwr.edu.pl.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7292-9327
Wrocław University of Science and Technology · PLUniversity of Sassari · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The main goal of the presented study was to design a biosensor-based system for epinephrine (EP) detection using a poly-thiophene derivative and tyrosinase as a biorecognition element. We compared two different electroanalytical techniques to select the most prominent technique for analyzing the neurotransmitter. The prepared biosensor system exhibited good parameters; the differential pulse (DPV) technique presented a wide linear range (1-20 μM and 30-200 μM), with a low detection limit (0.18 nM and 1.03 nM). In the case of chronoamperometry (CA), a high signal-to-noise ratio and lower reproducibility were observed, causing a less broad linear range (10-200 μM) and a higher detection limit (125 nM). Therefore, the DPV technique was used for the calculation of sensitivity (0.0011 μA mM

Identifiers

PMID36199318
PMCPMC9446417
OpenAlexW4294719439

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.