Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36199253›Full record

ArticleBiophysical journal2022

The stoichiometric interaction model for mesoscopic MD simulations of liquid-liquid phase separation.

Yutaka Murata, Toru Niina, Shoji Takada

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biophysical journal, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 35% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Biophysics of biomolecular condensates.Biophysical journal · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Yutaka MurataDepartment of Biophysics, Graduate School of Science, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan.
Toru NiinaDepartment of Biophysics, Graduate School of Science, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan.
Shoji TakadaDepartment of Biophysics, Graduate School of Science, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan. Electronic address: takada@biophys.kyoto-u.ac.jp.
Kyoto University · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Liquid-liquid phase separation (LLPS) has received considerable attention in recent years for explaining the formation of cellular biomolecular condensates. The fluidity and the complexity of their components make molecular simulation approaches indispensable for gaining structural insights. Domain-resolution mesoscopic model simulations have been explored for cases in which condensates are formed by multivalent proteins with tandem domains. One problem with this approach is that interdomain pairwise interactions cannot regulate the valency of the binding domains. To overcome this problem, we propose a new potential, the stoichiometric interaction (SI) potential. First, we verified that the SI potential maintained the valency of the interacting domains for the test systems. We then examined a well-studied LLPS model system containing tandem repeats of SH3 domains and proline-rich motifs. We found that the SI potential alone cannot reproduce the phase diagram of LLPS quantitatively. We had to combine the SI and a pairwise interaction; the former and the latter represent the specific and nonspecific interactions, respectively. Biomolecular condensates with the mixed SI and pairwise interaction exhibited fluidity, whereas those with the pairwise interaction alone showed no detectable diffusion. We also compared the phase diagrams of the systems containing different numbers of tandem domains with those obtained from the experiments and found quantitative agreement in all but one case.

Indexed as

Models, Statisticalsrc Homology Domains

Identifiers

PMID36199253
PMCPMC9703007
OpenAlexW4300978722

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.