Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36199143›Full record

ArticleRadiation oncology (London, England)2022

Ex vivo γH2AX assay for tumor radiosensitivity in primary prostate cancer patients and correlation with clinical parameters.

Ioana M Marinescu, Manuel Rogg, Simon Spohn, Moritz von Büren, Marius Kamps, Cordula A Jilg, Elena Fountzila, Kyriaki Papadopoulou, Lara Ceci, Alisa Bettermann and 7 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Radiation oncology (London, England), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Frontiers in physiology · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors at 7 institutions in 3 countries.

Ioana M MarinescuDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, Medical Center - University of Freiburg, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany. maria.marinescu@uniklinik-freiburg.de.
Manuel RoggInstitute for Surgical Pathology, Medical Center - University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.
Simon SpohnDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, Medical Center - University of Freiburg, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.
Moritz von BürenDepartment of Urology, Faculty of Medicine, Medical Center - University of Freiburg, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.
Marius KampsDepartment of Urology, Faculty of Medicine, Medical Center - University of Freiburg, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.
Cordula A JilgDepartment of Urology, Faculty of Medicine, Medical Center - University of Freiburg, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.
Elena FountzilaSecond Department of Medical Oncology, Euromedica General Clinic of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki, Greece.
Kyriaki PapadopoulouLaboratory of Molecular Oncology, Hellenic Foundation for Cancer Research, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki, Greece.
Lara CeciDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, Medical Center - University of Freiburg, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.
Alisa BettermannDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, Medical Center - University of Freiburg, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.
Juri RufDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Medical Center - University of Freiburg, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.
Matthias BenndorfDepartment of Radiology, Faculty of Medicine, Medical Center - University of Freiburg, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.
Sonja AdebahrDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, Medical Center - University of Freiburg, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.
Daniel ZipsMedical Faculty and University Hospital, Radiation Oncology, Eberhard Karls University Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.
Anca L GrosuDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, Medical Center - University of Freiburg, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.
Christoph Schell *Institute for Surgical Pathology, Medical Center - University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.
Constantinos Zamboglou *Department of Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, Medical Center - University of Freiburg, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.
University Medical Center Freiburg · DEUniversity of Freiburg · DEDeutschen Konsortium für Translationale Krebsforschung · DEGerman Cancer Research Center · DEAristotle University of Thessaloniki · GREuromedica · GREuropean University Cyprus · CY

Funding

Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft SCHE 2092/3-1, SCHE 2092/4-1 [RP9, CP2, CP3] and CRU329, Project-ID 43198400-SFB1453
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backroundAccurate surrogate parameters for radio resistance are warranted for individualized radiotherapy (RT) concepts in prostate cancer (PCa). The purpose of this study was to assess intertumoral heterogeneity in terms of radio resistance using an ex-vivo γH2AX assay after irradiation of prostate biopsy cores and to investigate its correlation with clinical features of respective patients as well as imaging and genomic features of tumor areas.

methodsTwenty one patients with histologically-proven PCa and pre-therapeutic multiparametric resonance imaging and prostate-specific membrane antigen positron emission tomography were included in the study. Biopsy cores were collected from 26 PCa foci. Residual γH2AX foci were counted 24 h after ex-vivo irradiation (with 0 and 4 Gy) of biopsy specimen and served as a surrogate for radio resistance. Clinical, genomic (next generation sequencing) and imaging features were collected and their association with the radio resistance was studied.

resultsIn total 18 PCa lesions from 16 patients were included in the final analysis. The median γH2AX foci value per PCa lesion was 3.12. According to this, the patients were divided into two groups (radio sensitive vs. radio resistant) with significant differences in foci number (p < 0.0001). The patients in the radio sensitive group had significantly higher prostate specific antigen serum concentration (p = 0.015), tumor areas in the radio sensitive group had higher SUV (standardized uptake values in PSMA PET)-max and -mean values (p = 0.0037, p = 0.028) and lower ADC (apparent diffusion coefficient-mean values, p = 0.049). All later parameters had significant (p < 0.05) correlations in Pearson's test. One patient in the radio sensitive group displayed a previously not reported loss of function frameshift mutation in the NBN gene (c.654_658delAAAAC) that introduces a premature termination codon and results in a truncated protein.

conclusionIn this pilot study, significant differences in intertumoral radio resistance were observed and clinical as well as imaging parameters may be applied for their prediction. After further prospective validation in larger patient cohorts these finding may lead to individual RT dose prescription for PCa patients in the future.

Indexed as

Prostate-Specific AntigenProstatic NeoplasmsCodon, NonsenseHumansMalePilot ProjectsPositron Emission Tomography Computed TomographyRadiation ToleranceCodon, NonsenseProstate-Specific AntigenIntrinsic radio sensitivityProstate cancerRadiotherapyStandardized uptake valuesγH2AX foci

Identifiers

PMID36199143
PMCPMC9533509
OpenAlexW4302284145

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.