Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36199120›Full record

ArticleTrials2022

The BEACON study: an update to the protocol for a cohort study as part of an evaluation of the effectiveness of smartphone-assisted problem-solving therapy in men who present with intentional self-harm to emergency departments in Ontario.

Simon Hatcher, Marnin J Heisel, Oydeji Ayonrinde, Daniel Corsi, Nicole E Edgar, Sidney H Kennedy, Sakina J Rizvi, Ayal Schaffer, Mark Sinyor

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in Trials, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03473535 (The BEACON Study), which is not on this map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 86% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03473535 naunknown statusnot on this map

The BEACON Study: Protocol for a Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial of Smartphone-assisted Problem Solving Therapy in Men Who Present With Intentional Self-harm to Emergency Departments in Ontario

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of OttawaRan2020 to 2024Enrolled100ConditionsIntentional Self-Harm, SuicideArmsBEACON + Problem Solving Therapy, Problem-Solving Therapy
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 6 institutions in 3 countries.

Simon HatcherClinical Epidemiology Program, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, 501 Smyth Road, Ottawa, ON, Canada. shatcher@toh.ca.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3117-2350
Marnin J HeiselDepartments of Psychiatry and of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Western University, Parkwood Institute, Mental Health Care Building, London, ON, F4-365, Canada.
Oydeji AyonrindeDepartment of Psychiatry, Queen's University, 752 King Street West, Postal Bag 603, Kingston, ON, Canada.
Daniel CorsiSchool of Epidemiology and Public Health, University of Ottawa, 600 Peter Morand Crescent, Ottawa, ON, Canada.
Nicole E EdgarClinical Epidemiology Program, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, 501 Smyth Road, Ottawa, ON, Canada.
Sidney H KennedyCentre for Depression & Suicide Studies, St. Michael's Hospital, 193 Yonge St. Suite 6-001A, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Sakina J RizviDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Toronto, 250 College Street, 8th floor, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Ayal SchafferDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Toronto, 250 College Street, 8th floor, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Mark SinyorDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Toronto, 250 College Street, 8th floor, Toronto, ON, Canada.
St. Michael's Hospital · CASunnybrook Health Science Centre · CAUniversity of Ottawa · CAOttawa Hospital · CAQueen's University · CAWestern University · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMen who present to the emergency department (ED) with self-harm are at high risk of dying by suicide, with 2.7% of men dying in the year following their presentation, more than double the rate for women (1.2%). Despite this, care received after an ED visit is highly variable and many are not assessed for psychological needs. Furthermore, the limited psychological care that is available is often not covered by provincial health insurance. Even when referrals for follow-up care are made, engagement rates are low. Previous recommendations to improve engagement include written discharge plans, caring contacts, and focused interventions targeting middle-aged men at elevated risk of dying by suicide. Blended care, the incorporation of technology into traditional care, has also been proposed as a method to increase engagement in and clinical benefits from psychotherapy. This project aims to determine whether the delivery of an evidence based treatment (problem-solving therapy (PST)) is enhanced by the addition of a custom smartphone application (BEACON) compared to usual care. Due to the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on site participation and the planned implementation, we have made several changes to the study design, primary outcome, and implementation.

methodWe originally proposed a cohort study nested within a larger cluster randomized trial wherein intervention sites would deliver the blended care, and control sites, whose personnel were not aware of their participation, would continue delivering usual care. The cohort study evaluated participant level outcomes as previously described by Hatcher et al. (2020). Due to pandemic-related constraints, our number of participating sites dropped to five potential sites which left the cohort study underpowered. As such, we changed the study design to a multi-site, individual randomized controlled trial (RCT) among the five remaining sites. Participants will be randomized to six sessions of therapy (PST) alone, or to the therapy plus BEACON, and followed up for 6 months. Our primary outcome was changed to evaluate feasibility and acceptability with the aim of designing a definitive RCT. Study implementation was reimagined to allow for completely virtual/online conduct to comply with local COVID-19 and institutional restrictions on in-person activities.

conclusionThis updated protocol will provide strong results for the planning of a definitive RCT of the blended care intervention in the future, addressing areas of difficulty and concern prior to its implementation. We will evaluate the feasibility of the study intervention, assess recruitment and retention of participants, and address challenges with implementing the protocol. Lastly, we will evaluate the appropriateness of our primary outcome measure and accurately determine a sample size for a definitive RCT.

trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03473535 . Registered on March 22, 2018.

Indexed as

COVID-19Self-Injurious BehaviorCohort StudiesEmergency Service, HospitalFeasibility StudiesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedOntarioPsychotherapyRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicSmartphone

Identifiers

PMID36199120
PMCPMC9532822
OpenAlexW4301400985

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.