Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36199085›Full record

ReviewMicrobial cell factories2022

Recombinant vaccines in 2022: a perspective from the cell factory.

Marianna Teixeira de Pinho Favaro, Jan Atienza-Garriga, Carlos Martínez-Torró, Eloi Parladé, Esther Vázquez, José Luis Corchero, Neus Ferrer-Miralles, Antonio Villaverde

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Microbial cell factories, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. A biosensor toolbox for monitoring recombinant protein production inFrontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2026
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Cells · 2025
    Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Mucosal Administration ofJournal of microbiology and biotechnology · 2024
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Marianna Teixeira de Pinho Favaro *Institut de Biotecnologia i de Biomedicina, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Cerdanyola del Vallés, 08193, Barcelona, Spain.
Jan Atienza-Garriga *Institut de Biotecnologia i de Biomedicina, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Cerdanyola del Vallés, 08193, Barcelona, Spain.
Carlos Martínez-Torró *Institut de Biotecnologia i de Biomedicina, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Cerdanyola del Vallés, 08193, Barcelona, Spain.
Eloi Parladé *Institut de Biotecnologia i de Biomedicina, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Cerdanyola del Vallés, 08193, Barcelona, Spain.
Esther VázquezInstitut de Biotecnologia i de Biomedicina, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Cerdanyola del Vallés, 08193, Barcelona, Spain. Esther.Vazquez@uab.cat.
José Luis CorcheroInstitut de Biotecnologia i de Biomedicina, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Cerdanyola del Vallés, 08193, Barcelona, Spain. jlcorchero@ciber-bbn.es.
Neus Ferrer-MirallesInstitut de Biotecnologia i de Biomedicina, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Cerdanyola del Vallés, 08193, Barcelona, Spain. Neus.Ferrer@uab.cat.
Antonio VillaverdeInstitut de Biotecnologia i de Biomedicina, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Cerdanyola del Vallés, 08193, Barcelona, Spain. antonio.villaverde@uab.cat.

Funding

Agència de Gestió d'Ajuts Universitaris i de Recerca 2020PANDE00003Agencia Estatal de Investigación PID2019-107298RB-C22Agencia Estatal de Investigación PID2020-116174RB-I00Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo 2021/08528-0Instituto de Salud Carlos III PI20/00770Ministerio de Ciencia, Innovación y Universidades Margarita SalasMinisterio de Ciencia, Innovación y Universidades PU20/02260Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona NAUTILIS Proof-of-Concept
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The last big outbreaks of Ebola fever in Africa, the thousands of avian influenza outbreaks across Europe, Asia, North America and Africa, the emergence of monkeypox virus in Europe and specially the COVID-19 pandemics have globally stressed the need for efficient, cost-effective vaccines against infectious diseases. Ideally, they should be based on transversal technologies of wide applicability. In this context, and pushed by the above-mentioned epidemiological needs, new and highly sophisticated DNA-or RNA-based vaccination strategies have been recently developed and applied at large-scale. Being very promising and effective, they still need to be assessed regarding the level of conferred long-term protection. Despite these fast-developing approaches, subunit vaccines, based on recombinant proteins obtained by conventional genetic engineering, still show a wide spectrum of interesting potentialities and an important margin for further development. In the 80's, the first vaccination attempts with recombinant vaccines consisted in single structural proteins from viral pathogens, administered as soluble plain versions. In contrast, more complex formulations of recombinant antigens with particular geometries are progressively generated and explored in an attempt to mimic the multifaceted set of stimuli offered to the immune system by replicating pathogens. The diversity of recombinant antimicrobial vaccines and vaccine prototypes is revised here considering the cell factory types, through relevant examples of prototypes under development as well as already approved products.

Indexed as

COVID-19Influenza VaccinesViral VaccinesAnimalsHumansRNAVaccinationVaccines, SubunitVaccines, SyntheticInfluenza VaccinesRNAVaccines, SubunitVaccines, SyntheticViral VaccinesAntigensNanoparticlesNanovaccinesRecombinant proteinsVaccinesVLPs

Identifiers

PMID36199085
PMCPMC9532831

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.