Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36199061›Full record

SynthesisBMC pulmonary medicine2022

A systematic review of cost-utility analyses of screening methods in latent tuberculosis infection in high-risk populations.

James Mahon, Sophie Beale, Hayden Holmes, Mick Arber, Vladyslav Nikolayevskyy, Riccardo Alagna, Davide Manissero, David Dowdy, Giovanni Battista Migliori, Giovanni Sotgiu and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in BMC pulmonary medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Screening and treatment practices for tuberculosis infection in Nordic, Baltic and Central European countries and Ukraine in 2023.European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Tuberculosis in Spain: An opinion paper.Revista espanola de quimioterapia : publicacion oficial de la Sociedad Espanola de Quimioterapia · 2023
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 7 institutions in 4 countries.

James MahonYork Health Economics Consortium, University of York, York, UK. Jamesmahon@coldingham-economics.co.uk.
Sophie BealeYork Health Economics Consortium, University of York, York, UK.
Hayden HolmesYork Health Economics Consortium, University of York, York, UK.
Mick ArberYork Health Economics Consortium, University of York, York, UK.
Vladyslav NikolayevskyyQIAGEN, Manchester, UK.
Riccardo AlagnaQIAGEN SRL, Via Filippo Sassetti 16, 20124, Milan, Italy.
Davide ManisseroQIAGEN, Manchester, UK.
David DowdyJohns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Giovanni Battista MiglioriServizio di Epidemiologia Clinica delle Malattie Respiratorie, Istituti Clinici Scientifici Maugeri IRCCS, Tradate, Italy.
Giovanni SotgiuScinze Mediche Chirurgiche E Sperimentali, Universita' degli Studi di Sassari, Sassari, Italy.
Raquel DuarteEPI Unit, Instituto de Saúde Pública da Universidade do Porto, Porto, Portugal.
Leeds and York Partnership NHS Foundation Trust · GBQiagen (United Kingdom) · GBUniversity of York · GBIstituti Clinici Scientifici Maugeri · ITJohns Hopkins University · USUniversidade do Porto · PTUniversity of Sassari · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe World Health Organisation (WHO) recommends that testing and treatment for latent tuberculosis infection (LTBI) should be undertaken in high-risk groups using either interferon gamma release assays (IGRAs) or a tuberculin skin test (TST). As IGRAs are more expensive than TST, an assessment of the cost-effectiveness of IGRAs can guide decision makers on the most appropriate choice of test for different high-risk populations. This current review aimed to provide the most up to date evidence on the cost-effectiveness evidence on LTBI testing in high-risk groups-specifically evidence reporting the costs per QALY of different testing strategies.

methodsA comprehensive search of databases including MEDLINE, EMBASE and NHS-EED was undertaken from 2011 up to March 2021. Studies were screened and extracted by two independent reviewers. The study quality was assessed using the Bias in Economic Evaluation Checklist (ECOBIAS). A narrative synthesis of the included studies was undertaken.

resultsThirty-two studies reported in thirty-three documents were included in this review. Quality of included studies was generally high, although there was a weakness across all studies referencing sources correctly and/or justifying choices of parameter values chosen or assumptions where parameter values were not available. Inclusions of IGRAs in testing strategies was consistently found across studies to be cost-effective but this result was sensitive to underlying LTBI prevalence rates.

conclusionWhile some concerns remain about uncertainty in parameter values used across included studies, the evidence base since 2010 has grown with modelling approaches addressing the weakness pointed out in previous reviews but still reaching the same conclusion that IGRAs are likely to be cost-effective in high-income countries for high-risk populations. Evidence is also required on the cost-effectiveness of different strategies in low to middle income countries and countries with high TB burden.

Indexed as

Latent TuberculosisCost-Benefit AnalysisHumansInterferon-gamma Release TestsMass ScreeningPrevalenceTuberculin TestCost-effectivenessCost-utilitySystematic ReviewTestingTuberculosis

Identifiers

PMID36199061
PMCPMC9533619
OpenAlexW4301585975

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.