Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36198861›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2022

Malignancy risk stratification of thyroid nodules according to echotexture and degree of hypoechogenicity: a retrospective multicenter validation study.

Ji Ye Lee, Chang Yoon Lee, Inpyeong Hwang, Sung-Hye You, Sun-Won Park, Boeun Lee, Ra Gyoung Yoon, Younghee Yim, Ji-Hoon Kim, Dong Gyu Na

Open access · goldAbstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 7 institutions in 2 countries.

Ji Ye LeeDepartment of Radiology, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, 03080, Korea.ORCID 0000-0002-3929-6254
Chang Yoon LeeDepartment of Radiology, Research Institute and Hospital, National Cancer Center, Goyang, 10408, Republic of Korea. leechy78@hanmail.net.ORCID 0000-0001-8645-3569
Inpyeong HwangDepartment of Radiology, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, 03080, Korea.ORCID 0000-0002-1291-8973
Sung-Hye YouDepartment of Radiology, Anam Hospital, Korea University College of Medicine, Seoul, 02841, Korea.ORCID 0000-0001-5005-9383
Sun-Won ParkDepartment of Radiology, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, 03080, Korea.ORCID 0000-0002-5063-2685
Boeun LeeDepartment of Radiology, Ewha Womans University Seoul Hospital, Ewha Womans University, Seoul, 07804, Korea.ORCID 0000-0001-5471-8825
Ra Gyoung YoonDepartment of Radiology, Nowon Eulji Medical Center, Eulji University College of Medicine, Seoul, 01830, Korea.ORCID 0000-0003-3203-921X
Younghee YimDepartment of Radiology, Chung-Ang University Hospital, Chung-Ang University College of Medicine, Seoul, 06973, Korea.ORCID 0000-0002-4224-7832
Ji-Hoon KimDepartment of Radiology, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, 03080, Korea.ORCID 0000-0002-6349-6950
Dong Gyu NaDepartment of Radiology, Gangneung Asan Hospital, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Gangneung, 25440, Korea.ORCID 0000-0001-6422-1652
Seoul National University · KRChung-Ang University Hospital · KREulji University · KREwha Womans University · KRKorea University Medical Center · KRNational Cancer Center · USUlsan College · KR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Various risk stratification systems show discrepancies in the ultrasound lexicon of nodule echotexture and hypoechogenicity. This study aimed to determine the malignancy risk of thyroid nodules according to their echotexture and degree of hypoechogenicity. From June to September 2015, we retrospectively evaluated 5601 thyroid nodules with final diagnoses from 26 institutions. Nodules were stratified according to the echotexture (homogeneous vs. heterogeneous) and degree of hypoechogenicity (mild, moderate, or marked). We calculated the malignancy risk according to composition and suspicious features. Heterogeneous hypoechoic nodules showed a significantly higher malignancy risk than heterogeneous isoechoic nodules (P ≤ 0.017), except in partially cystic nodules. Malignancy risks were not significantly different between homogeneous versus heterogeneous nodules in both hypoechoic (P ≥ 0.086) and iso- hyperechoic nodules (P ≥ 0.05). Heterogeneous iso-hyperechoic nodules without suspicious features showed a low malignancy risk. The malignancy risks of markedly and moderately hypoechoic nodules were not significantly different in all subgroups (P ≥ 0.48). Marked or moderately hypoechoic nodules showed a significantly higher risk than mild hypoechoic (P ≤ 0.016) nodules. The predominant echogenicity effectively stratifies the malignancy risk of nodules with heterogeneous echotexture. The degree of hypoechogenicity could be stratified as mild versus moderate to marked hypoechogenicity.

Indexed as

Thyroid NeoplasmsThyroid NoduleHumansRetrospective StudiesRisk AssessmentUltrasonography

Identifiers

PMID36198861
PMCPMC9534858
OpenAlexW4301600199

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.