ArticleScientific reports2022
The elevation of different myocardial biomarkers on admission is associated with disease features and different outcomes in aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage.
Article in Scientific reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- Prognostic value of elevated cardiac troponin in aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Frontiers in neurology · 2025Pooled it
- Diagnostic value of inflammatory indexes combined with myocardial enzymes for aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage in patients with intracranial aneurysms.IBRO neuroscience reports · 2025Article
- Metabolomics analysis reveals the effects ofHeliyon · 2024Article
- Cerebrospinal Fluid and Serum Biomarker Insights in Aneurysmal Subarachnoid Haemorrhage: Navigating the Brain-Heart Interrelationship for Improved Patient Outcomes.Biomedicines · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Test of different myocardial biomarkers is commonly arranged in patients with aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (aSAH). We sought to figure out whether different myocardial biomarkers' elevation is related to characteristics of ruptured aneurysms and patients' clinical outcomes. Patients with aSAH admitted in the Neurosurgery Department of West China Hospital from September 2019 to March 2020 were screened. Those who have one clear responsible aneurysm and met inclusion criteria were included. Clinical characteristics, site and size of the aneurysm, modified Fisher scale, troponin T (TPN-T), creatine kinase MB (CK-MB), and myoglobin (Myo) levels at admission, clinical outcomes (3-month mRS) were collected and compared. The study included 124 patients. After multivariate logistic regression, Hunt & Hess grade (per unit grade, OR 1.68, 95% CI 1.14-2.49), the size of ruptured aneurysm (equal to or more than 7 mm, OR 3.07, 95% CI 1.32-7.10) was highly predictive of myocardial biomarker elevation. All three biomarkers (TPN-T, CK-MB, Myo) were associated with unfavorable prognoses. Higher mortality (37.2% vs. 18.6%, P = 0.036) and a lower rate of good outcomes (41.9% vs. 71.2%, P = 0.003) were observed in patients with any positive myocardial biomarkers at admission. The clinical outcomes of patients with positive troponin T and negative creatine kinase MB were especially unfavorable. Our study demonstrates that the degree of neurological injury and size of ruptured aneurysm are strong predictors of myocardial biomarkers elevation, the site of ruptured aneurysm may not be associated with heart injury after SAH. The outcomes of patients with different combinations of abnormal biomarker levels may have significant differences and deserve further study.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.