Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36198450›Full record

ReviewBMJ open2022

What influences cancer treatment service access in Ghana? A critical interpretive synthesis.

Chloe Zabrina Tuck, Robert Akparibo, Laura A Gray, Richmond Nii Okai Aryeetey, Richard Cooper

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in BMJ open, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Chloe Zabrina TuckSchool of Health and Related Research (ScHARR), The University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK cztuck1@sheffield.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0003-3525-6295
Robert AkpariboSchool of Health and Related Research (ScHARR), The University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK.
Laura A GraySchool of Health and Related Research (ScHARR), The University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-6365-7710
Richmond Nii Okai AryeeteyPopulation Family and Reproductive Health, University of Ghana, Legon, Greater Accra, Ghana.
Richard CooperSchool of Health and Related Research (ScHARR), The University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-5110-0384

Funding

Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesMultiple social-cultural and contextual factors influence access to and acceptance of cancer treatment in Ghana. The aim of this research was to assess existing literature on how these factors interplay and could be susceptible to local and national policy changes.

designThis study uses a critical interpretive synthesis approach to review qualitative and quantitative evidence about access to adult cancer treatment services in Ghana, applying the socioecological model and candidacy framework.

resultsOur findings highlighted barriers to accessing cancer services within each level of the socioecological model (intrapersonal, interpersonal community, organisational and policy levels), which are dynamic and interacting, for example, community level factors influenced individual perceptions and how they managed financial barriers. Evidence was lacking in relation to determinants of treatment non-acceptance across all cancers and in the most vulnerable societal groups due to methodological limitations.

conclusionsFuture policy should prioritise multilevel approaches, for example, improving the quality and affordability of medical care while also providing collaboration with traditional and complementary care systems to refer patients. Research should seek to overcome methodological limitations to understand the determinants of accessing treatment in the most vulnerable populations.

Indexed as

Health Services AccessibilityNeoplasmsAdultCosts and Cost AnalysisGhanaHumansQualitative ResearchVulnerable PopulationsAdult oncologyHealth economicsHealth policyPublic health

Identifiers

PMID36198450
PMCPMC9535186

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.