Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36198386›Full record

ReviewMolecular & cellular proteomics : MCP2022

Deciphering Spatial Protein-Protein Interactions in Brain Using Proximity Labeling.

Boby Mathew, Shveta Bathla, Kenneth R Williams, Angus C Nairn

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Molecular & cellular proteomics : MCP, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Progress toward a comprehensive brain protein interactome.Biochemical Society transactions · 2025
    Review
  10. Cancers · 2025
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Comparison of two peroxidases with high potential for biotechnology applications - HRPComputational and structural biotechnology journal · 2024
    Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Boby MathewYale/NIDA Neuroproteomics Center, New Haven, Connecticut, USA; Molecular Biophysics and Biochemistry, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, USA. Electronic address: boby.mathew@yale.edu.
Shveta BathlaYale/NIDA Neuroproteomics Center, New Haven, Connecticut, USA; Department of Psychiatry, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut, USA.
Kenneth R WilliamsYale/NIDA Neuroproteomics Center, New Haven, Connecticut, USA; Molecular Biophysics and Biochemistry, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, USA.
Angus C NairnYale/NIDA Neuroproteomics Center, New Haven, Connecticut, USA; Department of Psychiatry, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut, USA. Electronic address: angus.nairn@yale.edu.

Funding

Yale/NIDA Neuroproteomics Research CenterP30DA018343 · NIDA · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI ANGUS C. NAIRN, Kenneth Robert WILLIAMS · 2004 to 2026
$37.1M
Yale Alzheimer Disease Research CenterP30AG066508 · NIA · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI STEPHEN M STRITTMATTER · 2020 to 2026
$30.2M
Yale Alzheimer Disease Research CenterP50AG047270 · NIA · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI KWAN, CHUN-HAY ALEX · 2015 to 2019
$8.3M
The Massachusetts and Yale ADRC Collaborative Proteomic Biofluid Biomarker Discovery ProgramR01AG062306 · NIA · MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL · PI ARNOLD, STEVEN E, CARLYLE, BECKY CATHERINE · 2018 to 2022
$3.5M
NIA NIH HHS P30 AG066508NIA NIH HHS P50 AG047270NIA NIH HHS R01 AG062306NIDA NIH HHS P30 DA018343
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cellular biomolecular complexes including protein-protein, protein-RNA, and protein-DNA interactions regulate and execute most biological functions. In particular in brain, protein-protein interactions (PPIs) mediate or regulate virtually all nerve cell functions, such as neurotransmission, cell-cell communication, neurogenesis, synaptogenesis, and synaptic plasticity. Perturbations of PPIs in specific subsets of neurons and glia are thought to underly a majority of neurobiological disorders. Therefore, understanding biological functions at a cellular level requires a reasonably complete catalog of all physical interactions between proteins. An enzyme-catalyzed method to biotinylate proximal interacting proteins within 10 to 300 nm of each other is being increasingly used to characterize the spatiotemporal features of complex PPIs in brain. Thus, proximity labeling has emerged recently as a powerful tool to identify proteomes in distinct cell types in brain as well as proteomes and PPIs in structures difficult to isolate, such as the synaptic cleft, axonal projections, or astrocyte-neuron junctions. In this review, we summarize recent advances in proximity labeling methods and their application to neurobiology.

Indexed as

Cell CommunicationProteomeBiotinylationBrainSynapsesProteomebiotinylationneuroproteomicsprotein interaction networkprotein–protein interactionsproximity labeling

Identifiers

PMID36198386
PMCPMC9650050

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.