Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36198250›Full record

ArticleUltrasonics sonochemistry2022

Temperature as a key parameter for graphene sono-exfoliation in water.

Amanpreet Kaur, Justin A Morton, Anastasia V Tyurnina, Abhinav Priyadarshi, Adam Holland, Jiawei Mi, Kyriakos Porfyrakis, Dmitry G Eskin, Iakovos Tzanakis

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Ultrasonics sonochemistry, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Amanpreet KaurSchool of Engineering, Computing and Mathematics, Oxford Brookes University, College Cl, Wheatley, Oxford OX33 1HX, UK.
Justin A MortonSchool of Engineering, Computing and Mathematics, Oxford Brookes University, College Cl, Wheatley, Oxford OX33 1HX, UK.
Anastasia V TyurninaBrunel Centre for Advanced Solidification Technology, Brunel University London, Kingston Lane, UB8 3PH, UK.
Abhinav PriyadarshiSchool of Engineering, Computing and Mathematics, Oxford Brookes University, College Cl, Wheatley, Oxford OX33 1HX, UK.
Adam HollandKyoto Cl, Moulton Park Industrial Estate, Moulton Park, Northampton NN3 6FL, UK.
Jiawei MiDepartment of Engineering, University of Hull, Cottingham Rd, Hull HU6 7RX, UK.
Kyriakos PorfyrakisFaculty of Engineering and Science, University of Greenwich, Central Avenue, Chatham Maritime, Kent ME4 4TB, UK.
Dmitry G EskinBrunel Centre for Advanced Solidification Technology, Brunel University London, Kingston Lane, UB8 3PH, UK.
Iakovos TzanakisSchool of Engineering, Computing and Mathematics, Oxford Brookes University, College Cl, Wheatley, Oxford OX33 1HX, UK; Department of Materials, University of Oxford, Parks Rd, Oxford OX1 3PH, UK. Electronic address: itzanakis@brookes.ac.uk.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Graphene dispersions in water are highly desirable for a range of applications such as biomedicines, separation membranes, coatings, inkjet printing and more. Recent novel research has been focussed on developing a green approach for scalable production of graphene. However, one important parameter, which is often neglected is the bulk temperature of the processing liquid. This paper follows our earlier work where optimal sono-exfoliation parameters of graphite in aqueous solutions were determined based on the measured acoustic pressure fields at various temperatures and input powers. Here, we take the next step forward and demonstrate using systematic characterisation techniques and acoustic pressure measurements that sonication-assisted liquid phase exfoliation (LPE) of graphite powder can indeed produce high quality few layer graphene flakes in pure water at a specific temperature, i.e. 40 °C, and at an optimised input generator power of 50%, within 2-h of processing. UV-vis analysis also revealed that the exfoliation, stability and uniformity of dispersions were improved with increasing temperature. We further confirmed the successful exfoliation of graphene sheets with minimal level of defects in the optimized sample with the help of Raman microscopy and transmission electron microscopy. This study demonstrated that understanding and controlling processing temperature is one of the key parameters for graphene exfoliation in water which offers a potential pathway for its large-scale production.

Indexed as

Cavitation bubblesEco-friendlyExfoliationGrapheneShock wavesUltrasonic processingWater

Identifiers

PMID36198250
PMCPMC9530948

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.