Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36198225›Full record

ArticleComputers in biology and medicine2022

Reducing uncertainty in cancer risk estimation for patients with indeterminate pulmonary nodules using an integrated deep learning model.

Riqiang Gao, Thomas Li, Yucheng Tang, Kaiwen Xu, Mirza Khan, Michael Kammer, Sanja L Antic, Stephen Deppen, Yuankai Huo, Thomas A Lasko and 3 more

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Computers in biology and medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Riqiang GaoVanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, 37235, USA. Electronic address: riqiang.gao@vanderbilt.edu.
Thomas LiVanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, 37235, USA.
Yucheng TangVanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, 37235, USA.
Kaiwen XuVanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, 37235, USA.
Mirza KhanVanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, 37235, USA.
Michael KammerVanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, 37235, USA.
Sanja L AnticVanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, 37235, USA.
Stephen DeppenVanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, 37235, USA.
Yuankai HuoVanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, 37235, USA.
Thomas A LaskoVanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, 37235, USA.
Kim L SandlerVanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, 37235, USA.
Fabien MaldonadoVanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, 37235, USA.
Bennett A LandmanVanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, 37235, USA; Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, 37235, USA.
Vanderbilt University Medical Center · USVanderbilt University · US

Funding

VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY CTSA FOR PEDIATRIC RESEARCHUL1RR024975 · NCRR · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY · PI BERNARD, GORDON RAPHAEL · 2007 to 2011
$45.7M
The Vanderbilt Institute for Clinical and Translational Research (VICTR)UL1TR000445 · NCATS · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER · PI BERNARD, GORDON RAPHAEL · 2012 to 2016
$41.4M
Validation of Biomarkers of Risk for the Early Detection of Lung CancerU01CA152662 · NCI · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER · PI DEPPEN, STEPHEN, GROGAN, ERIC L · 2010 to 2025
$12.8M
Cellular, molecular and quantitative imaging analysis of screening-detected lung adenocarcinomaU01CA196405 · NCI · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER · PI MALDONADO, FABIEN · 2015 to 2020
$5.4M
Controlling Quality and Capturing Uncertainty in Advanced Diffusion Weighted MRIR01EB017230 · NIBIB · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY · PI LANDMAN, BENNETT A. · 2015 to 2024
$5.1M
Novel Integrative Approach for the Early Detection of Lung Cancer using Repeated MeasuresR01CA253923 · NCI · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER · PI LANDMAN, BENNETT A., MALDONADO, FABIEN · 2021 to 2025
$3.4M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR000445NCI NIH HHS R01 CA253923NCI NIH HHS U01 CA152662NCI NIH HHS U01 CA196405NCRR NIH HHS UL1 RR024975NIBIB NIH HHS R01 EB017230
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivePatients with indeterminate pulmonary nodules (IPN) with an intermediate to a high probability of lung cancer generally undergo invasive diagnostic procedures. Chest computed tomography image and clinical data have been in estimating the pretest probability of lung cancer. In this study, we apply a deep learning network to integrate multi-modal data from CT images and clinical data (including blood-based biomarkers) to improve lung cancer diagnosis. Our goal is to reduce uncertainty and to avoid morbidity, mortality, over- and undertreatment of patients with IPNs.

methodWe use a retrospective study design with cross-validation and external-validation from four different sites. We introduce a deep learning framework with a two-path structure to learn from CT images and clinical data. The proposed model can learn and predict with single modality if the multi-modal data is not complete. We use 1284 patients in the learning cohort for model development. Three external sites (with 155, 136 and 96 patients, respectively) provided patient data for external validation. We compare our model to widely applied clinical prediction models (Mayo and Brock models) and image-only methods (e.g., Liao et al. model).

resultsOur co-learning model improves upon the performance of clinical-factor-only (Mayo and Brock models) and image-only (Liao et al.) models in both cross-validation of learning cohort (e.g. , AUC: 0.787 (ours) vs. 0.707-0.719 (baselines), results reported in validation fold and external-validation using three datasets from University of Pittsburgh Medical Center (e.g., 0.918 (ours) vs. 0.828-0.886 (baselines)), Detection of Early Cancer Among Military Personnel (e.g., 0.712 (ours) vs. 0.576-0.709 (baselines)), and University of Colorado Denver (e.g., 0.847 (ours) vs. 0.679-0.746 (baselines)). In addition, our model achieves better re-classification performance (cNRI 0.04 to 0.20) in all cross- and external-validation sets compared to the Mayo model.

conclusionsLung cancer risk estimation in patients with IPNs can benefit from the co-learning of CT image and clinical data. Learning from more subjects, even though those only have a single modality, can improve the prediction accuracy. An integrated deep learning model can achieve reasonable discrimination and re-classification performance.

Indexed as

Deep LearningLung NeoplasmsMultiple Pulmonary NodulesHumansRetrospective StudiesUncertaintyCancer risk estimationChest CTClinical factorsDeep learningLung cancer

Identifiers

PMID36198225
PMCPMC10050219
OpenAlexW4298007208

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.