ArticleMagnetic resonance in medicine2023
An interventional MRI guidewire combining profile and tip conspicuity for catheterization at 0.55T.
Article in Magnetic resonance in medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.
- Intraluminal MRI and interventions: Innovation and application.EngMedicine · 2025Article
- Interventional device tracking under MRI via alternating current controlled inhomogeneities.Magnetic resonance in medicine · 2024Article
- Cardiac MRI at Low Field Strengths.Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI · 2024Review
- Interventional cardiovascular magnetic resonance: state-of-the-art.Journal of cardiovascular magnetic resonance : official journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance · 2023Review
- RF-induced heating of interventional devices at 23.66 MHz.Magma (New York, N.Y.) · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
purposeWe describe a clinical grade, "active", monopole antenna-based metallic guidewire that has a continuous shaft-to-tip image profile, a pre-shaped tip-curve, standard 0.89 mm (0.035″) outer diameter, and a detachable connector for catheter exchange during cardiovascular catheterization at 0.55T.
methodsElectromagnetic simulations were performed to characterize the magnetic field around the antenna whip for continuous tip visibility. The active guidewire was manufactured using medical grade materials in an ISO Class 7 cleanroom. RF-induced heating of the active guidewire prototype was tested in one gel phantom per ASTM 2182-19a, alone and in tandem with clinical metal-braided catheters. Real-time MRI visibility was tested in one gel phantom and in-vivo in two swine. Mechanical performance was compared with commercial equivalents.
resultsThe active guidewire provided continuous "profile" shaft and tip visibility in-vitro and in-vivo, analogous to guidewire shaft-and-tip profiles under X-ray. The MRI signal signature matched simulation results. Maximum unscaled RF-induced temperature rise was 5.2°C and 6.5°C (3.47 W/kg local background specific absorption rate), alone and in tandem with a steel-braided catheter, respectively. Mechanical characteristics matched commercial comparator guidewires.
conclusionThe active guidewire was clearly visible via real-time MRI at 0.55T and exhibits a favorable geometric sensitivity profile depicting the guidewire continuously from shaft-to-tip including a unique curved-tip signature. RF-induced heating is clinically acceptable. This design allows safe device navigation through luminal structures and heart chambers. The detachable connector allows delivery and exchange of cardiovascular catheters while maintaining guidewire position. This enhanced guidewire design affords the expected performance of X-ray guidewires during human MRI catheterization.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.