Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36198057›Full record

ArticleJournal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR2022

Beyond Speech Intelligibility: Quantifying Behavioral and Perceived Listening Effort in Response to Dysarthric Speech.

Annalise R Fletcher, Alan A Wisler, Emily R Gruver, Stephanie A Borrie

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Perceptual Outcome Measures for Supplementing Transcription Intelligibility in Speakers with Parkinson's Disease and Mild Dysarthria.Folia phoniatrica et logopaedica : official organ of the International Association of Logopedics and Phoniatrics (IALP) · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Effects of Deep-Brain Stimulation on Speech: Perceptual and Acoustic Data.Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR · 2024
    Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Annalise R FletcherDepartment of Communicative Disorders and Deaf Education, Utah State University, Logan.ORCID 0000-0003-3030-5991
Alan A WislerDepartment of Mathematics and Statistics, Utah State University, Logan.ORCID 0000-0003-2601-2846
Emily R GruverDepartment of Audiology and Speech-Language Pathology, University of North Texas, Denton.
Stephanie A BorrieDepartment of Communicative Disorders and Deaf Education, Utah State University, Logan.ORCID 0000-0002-2336-0071

Funding

Perceptual training for improved intelligibility of dysarthric speechR21DC018867 · NIDCD · UTAH STATE UNIVERSITY · PI BORRIE, STEPHANIE ANNA, LANSFORD, KAITLIN LORRAINE · 2020 to 2021
$419k
NIDCD NIH HHS R21 DC018867
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThis study investigated whether listener processing of dysarthric speech requires the recruitment of more cognitive resources (i.e., higher levels of listening effort) than neurotypical speech. We also explored relationships between behavioral listening effort, perceived listening effort, and objective measures of word transcription accuracy.

methodA word recall paradigm was used to index behavioral listening effort. The primary task involved word transcription, whereas a memory task involved recalling words from previous sentences. Nineteen listeners completed the paradigm twice, once while transcribing dysarthric speech and once while transcribing neurotypical speech. Perceived listening effort was rated using a visual analog scale.

resultsResults revealed significant effects of dysarthria on the likelihood of correct word recall, indicating that the transcription of dysarthric speech required higher levels of behavioral listening effort relative to neurotypical speech. There was also a significant relationship between transcription accuracy and measures of behavioral listening effort, such that listeners who were more accurate in understanding dysarthric speech exhibited smaller changes in word recall when listening to dysarthria. The subjective measure of perceived listening effort did not have a statistically significant correlation with measures of behavioral listening effort or transcription accuracy.

conclusionsResults suggest that cognitive resources, particularly listeners' working memory capacity, are more taxed when deciphering dysarthric versus neurotypical speech. An increased demand on these resources may affect a listener's ability to remember aspects of their conversations with people with dysarthria, even when the speaker is fully intelligible.

Indexed as

Speech IntelligibilitySpeech PerceptionAuditory PerceptionDysarthriaHumansListening Effort

Identifiers

PMID36198057
PMCPMC9940894

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.