Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36198019›Full record

SynthesisCanadian journal of psychiatry. Revue canadienne de psychiatrie2023

A Systematic Review of the Risks of Motor Vehicle Crashes Associated with Psychiatric Disorders.

Mark J Rapoport, Justin Nathaniel Chee, Thadshagini Prabha, Jamie Dow, Ian Gillespie, Sjaan Koppel, Judith L Charlton, Desmond O'Neill, Paul C Donaghy, Angela Onkay Ho and 2 more

Open access · hybridAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Canadian journal of psychiatry. Revue canadienne de psychiatrie, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 7 institutions in 3 countries.

Mark J RapoportSunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Justin Nathaniel Chee467943Ontario Ministry of Transportation, Toronto ON, Canada.
Thadshagini Prabha467943Ontario Ministry of Transportation, Toronto ON, Canada.ORCID 0000-0003-0468-9047
Jamie DowSociété de l'assurance automobile du Québec, Gatineau, QC, Canada.
Ian Gillespie12358Faculty of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-7551-962X
Sjaan KoppelMonash University Accident Research Centre, 2541Monash University, Clayton, VIC, Australia.
Judith L CharltonMonash University Accident Research Centre, 2541Monash University, Clayton, VIC, Australia.
Desmond O'NeillNational Office for Traffic Medicine, Dublin, Ireland.
Paul C DonaghyTranslational and Clinical Research Institute, 5994Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.
Angela Onkay HoFaculty of Medicine - Department of Psychiatry, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.ORCID 0000-0001-9039-7715
John-Paul TaylorTranslational and Clinical Research Institute, 5994Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.
Mark TantCARA, Vias Institute, Brussels, Belgium.
Ministry of Transportation of Ontario · CAMonash University · AUNewcastle University · GBQuebec Automobile Insurance Corporation · CASunnybrook Health Science Centre · CAUniversity of British Columbia · CAUniversity of Toronto · CA

Funding

Department of Health
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivePsychiatric disorders and their treatments have the potential to adversely impact driving skills. However, it is unclear to what extent this poses a public health risk by increasing the risk of motor vehicle crashes (MVCs). The aim of this systematic review was to synthesize and critically appraise evidence on the risk of MVC for drivers with psychiatric disorders.

methodWe conducted a systematic review of the MVC risk associated with psychiatric disorders using seven databases in November 2019. Two reviewers examined each study and extracted data. The National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute Quality Assessment tools were used to assess each study's quality of evidence.

resultsWe identified 24 studies that met the inclusion criteria, including eight cohort, 10 case-control, and six cross-sectional designs. Quality assessment ratings were "Good" for four studies, "Fair" for 10, and "Poor" for 10. Self-report or questionnaires were used in place of objective measures of either MVC, psychiatric disorder, or both in 12 studies, and only seven adjusted for driving exposure. Fifteen studies reported an increased risk of MVC associated with psychiatric disorders, and nine did not. There was no category of disorder that was consistently associated with increased MVC risk.

conclusionThe available evidence is mixed, not of high quality, and does not support a blanket restriction on drivers with psychiatric disorder. An individualized approach, as recommended by international guidelines, should continue. Further research should include objective assessments of psychiatric disorders and MVC risk and adjust for driving exposure.

Indexed as

Accidents, TrafficAutomobile DrivingMental DisordersMotor VehiclesAnxiety DisordersCase-Control StudiesCohort StudiesCross-Sectional StudiesHumansMood DisordersRisk Assessmentfitness to drivemental disordersmood and anxiety disordersmotor vehicle crashespsychiatric disorders

Identifiers

PMID36198019
PMCPMC10037743
OpenAlexW4302027509

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.