Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36198015›Full record

ArticleMagnetic resonance in medicine2023

NOE-weighted imaging in tumors using low-duty-cycle 2π-CEST.

Jing Cui, Casey Sun, Zhongliang Zu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Magnetic resonance in medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Jing CuiVanderbilt University Institute of Imaging Science, Nashville, Tennessee, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-0902-8715
Casey SunVanderbilt University Institute of Imaging Science, Nashville, Tennessee, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-7542-4540
Zhongliang ZuVanderbilt University Institute of Imaging Science, Nashville, Tennessee, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-7361-7480

Funding

Nuclear Overhauser enhancement (NOE) MR imaging of choline phospholipids and their metabolismR01EB029443 · NIBIB · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER · PI ZU, ZHONGLIANG · 2021 to 2024
$1.5M
Validation of CEST MR Imaging of Creatine and Phosphocreatine in MuscleR21AR074261 · NIAMS · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER · PI ZU, ZHONGLIANG · 2018 to 2019
$382k
Optimizing Glutamate Imaging using CEST MRI at 3T Clinical ScannersR03EB029078 · NIBIB · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER · PI ZU, ZHONGLIANG · 2020 to 2021
$170k
NIAMS NIH HHS R21 AR074261NIBIB NIH HHS R01 EB029443NIBIB NIH HHS R03 EB029078
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeNuclear Overhauser enhancement (NOE)-mediated CEST imaging at -3.5 ppm has shown clinical interest in diagnosing tumors. Multiple-pool Lorentzian fit has been used to quantify NOE, which, however, requires a long scan time. Asymmetric analysis of CEST signals could be a simple and fast method to quantify this NOE, but it has contamination from the amide proton transfer (APT) at 3.5 ppm. This work proposes a new method using an asymmetric analysis of a low-duty-cycle pulsed-CEST sequence with a flip angle of 360°, termed 2π-CEST, to reduce the contribution from APT.

methodsSimulations were used to evaluate the capability of the 2π-CEST to reduce APT. Experiments on animal tumor models were performed to show its advantages compared with the conventional asymmetric analysis. Samples of reconstituted phospholipids and proteins were used to evaluate the molecular origin of this NOE.

resultsThe 2π-CEST has reduced contribution from APT. In tumors where we show that the NOE is comparable to the APT effect, reducing the contamination from APT is crucial. The results show that the NOE signal obtained with 2π-CEST in tumor regions appears more homogeneous than that obtained with the conventional method. The phantom study showed that both phospholipids and proteins contribute to the NOE at -3.5 ppm.

conclusionThe NOE at -3.5 ppm has a different contrast mechanism from APT and other CEST/NOE effects. The proposed 2π-CEST is more accurate than the conventional asymmetric analysis in detecting NOE, and requires much less scan time than the multiple-pool Lorentzian fit.

Indexed as

Brain NeoplasmsAmidesAnimalsDimapritImage Interpretation, Computer-AssistedMagnetic Resonance ImagingPhospholipidsProtonsAmidesAPTDimapritPhospholipidsProtonschemical exchange saturation transfer (CEST)magnetization transfer (MT)nuclear Overhauser enhancement (NOE)tumor

Identifiers

PMID36198015
PMCPMC9792266

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.