ArticlePLoS computational biology2022
Efficient Bayesian inference for stochastic agent-based models.
Article in PLoS computational biology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed.
- R-package agentBayes: Likelihood-based statistical methods for agent-based models.PLoS computational biology · 2026Article
- malariasimple: An R package for fast simulations of malaria transmission.PLoS computational biology · 2026Article
- Simulation-based inference of cell migration dynamics in complex spatial environments.NPJ systems biology and applications · 2026Article
- Hybrid modelling using simulation and machine learning in healthcare.Computers & operations research · 2026Review
- Article
- Advances in surrogate modeling for biological agent-based simulations: trends, challenges, and future prospects.Journal of mathematical biology · 2025Review
- Scalable inference and identifiability of kinetic parameters for transcriptional bursting from single cell data.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2025Article
- An efficient and flexible framework for inferring global sensitivity of agent-based model parameters.PLoS computational biology · 2025Article
- Smart epidemic control: A hybrid model blending ODEs and agent-based simulations for optimal, real-world intervention planning.PLoS computational biology · 2025Article
- Integrating artificial intelligence with mechanistic epidemiological modeling: a scoping review of opportunities and challenges.Nature communications · 2025Article
- Agent-based modeling in cancer biomedicine: applications and tools for calibration and validation.Cancer biology & therapy · 2024Review
- AMBER: A Modular Model for Tumor Growth, Vasculature and Radiation Response.Bulletin of mathematical biology · 2024Article
- Feedback between stochastic gene networks and population dynamics enables cellular decision-making.Science advances · 2024Article
- Modelling capture efficiency of single-cell RNA-sequencing data improves inference of transcriptome-wide burst kinetics.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2023Article
- Data-driven spatio-temporal modelling of glioblastoma.Royal Society open science · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The modelling of many real-world problems relies on computationally heavy simulations of randomly interacting individuals or agents. However, the values of the parameters that underlie the interactions between agents are typically poorly known, and hence they need to be inferred from macroscopic observations of the system. Since statistical inference rests on repeated simulations to sample the parameter space, the high computational expense of these simulations can become a stumbling block. In this paper, we compare two ways to mitigate this issue in a Bayesian setting through the use of machine learning methods: One approach is to construct lightweight surrogate models to substitute the simulations used in inference. Alternatively, one might altogether circumvent the need for Bayesian sampling schemes and directly estimate the posterior distribution. We focus on stochastic simulations that track autonomous agents and present two case studies: tumour growths and the spread of infectious diseases. We demonstrate that good accuracy in inference can be achieved with a relatively small number of simulations, making our machine learning approaches orders of magnitude faster than classical simulation-based methods that rely on sampling the parameter space. However, we find that while some methods generally produce more robust results than others, no algorithm offers a one-size-fits-all solution when attempting to infer model parameters from observations. Instead, one must choose the inference technique with the specific real-world application in mind. The stochastic nature of the considered real-world phenomena poses an additional challenge that can become insurmountable for some approaches. Overall, we find machine learning approaches that create direct inference machines to be promising for real-world applications. We present our findings as general guidelines for modelling practitioners.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.