Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36197736›Full record

ArticleEcology letters2022

Oceanic giants dance to atmospheric rhythms: Ephemeral wind-driven resource tracking by blue whales.

John P Ryan, Kelly J Benoit-Bird, William K Oestreich, Paul Leary, Kevin B Smith, Chad M Waluk, David E Cade, James A Fahlbusch, Brandon L Southall, John E Joseph and 4 more

Open access · hybridAbstract readLetter
In one paragraph

Article in Ecology letters, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
5.1field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 32 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Food, fear and physics drive collective behaviour in the ocean's pelagic zone.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2026
    Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Migratory birds modulate niche tradeoffs in rhythm with seasons and life history.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Insights into Blue Whale (Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2024
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

John P RyanMonterey Bay Aquarium Research Institute, Moss Landing, California, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7954-5369
Kelly J Benoit-BirdMonterey Bay Aquarium Research Institute, Moss Landing, California, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5868-0390
William K OestreichMonterey Bay Aquarium Research Institute, Moss Landing, California, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0137-5053
Paul LearyNaval Postgraduate School, Monterey, California, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6540-9542
Kevin B SmithNaval Postgraduate School, Monterey, California, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0424-9367
Chad M WalukMonterey Bay Aquarium Research Institute, Moss Landing, California, USA.
David E CadeHopkins Marine Station, Stanford University, Stanford, California, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3641-1242
James A FahlbuschHopkins Marine Station, Stanford University, Stanford, California, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9275-013X
Brandon L SouthallSouthall Environmental Associates, Inc., Aptos, California, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3863-2068
John E JosephNaval Postgraduate School, Monterey, California, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9267-9118
Tetyana MargolinaNaval Postgraduate School, Monterey, California, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1594-5974
John CalambokidisCascadia Research Collective, Olympia, Washington, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5028-7172
Andrew DeVogelaereMonterey Bay National Marine Sanctuary, Moss Landing, California, USA.
Jeremy A GoldbogenHopkins Marine Station, Stanford University, Stanford, California, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4170-7294
Monterey Bay Aquarium Research Institute · USNaval Postgraduate School · USSmithsonian Marine Station · USCascadia Research Collective · USUniversity of California, Santa Cruz · US

Funding

David and Lucile Packard FoundationNational Science Foundation 0739828National Science Foundation 1114794National Science Foundation IOS-1656676Office of Naval Research N000141612477Stanford University
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Trophic transfer of energy through marine food webs is strongly influenced by prey aggregation and its exploitation by predators. Rapid aggregation of some marine fish and crustacean forage species during wind-driven coastal upwelling has recently been discovered, motivating the hypothesis that predators of these forage species track the upwelling circulation in which prey aggregation occurs. We examine this hypothesis in the central California Current Ecosystem using integrative observations of upwelling dynamics, forage species' aggregation, and blue whale movement. Directional origins of blue whale calls repeatedly tracked upwelling plume circulation when wind-driven upwelling intensified and aggregation of forage species was heightened. Our findings illustrate a resource tracking strategy by which blue whales may maximize energy gain amid ephemeral foraging opportunities. These findings have implications for the ecology and conservation of diverse predators that are sustained by forage populations whose behaviour is responsive to episodic environmental dynamics.

Indexed as

BalaenopteraAnimalsEcosystemFood ChainOceans and SeasPredatory BehaviorWindblue whalescoastal upwellingdynamic managementforaging ecologymarine ecosystemsmovement ecologypredator-prey dynamicsresource tracking

Identifiers

PMID36197736
PMCPMC9827854
OpenAlexW4302011005

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.